Skip to content

GUSE vs JUSA

Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

GUSEANasdaq

JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

JUSAANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

JUSA −0.12pt a year

GUSE0.30%JUSA0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

JUSA 4.0×the volume

GUSE24.9KJUSA98.8K

GUSE vs JUSA Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%GUSE+10.4%JUSA

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GUSE +11.8%. JUSA +10.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GUSE 0.30%
JUSA 0.18%, better
Fund size
GUSE $421M
JUSA $745M
1Y total return
GUSE No data
JUSA +10.8%
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
JUSA 0.72%
Holdings
GUSE 122
JUSA 263
Avg volume (30D)
GUSE 24.9K sh
JUSA 98.8K sh, better
NAV per share
GUSE $46.05
JUSA $67.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GUSE: Cost 97, Risk 94, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 89, Durability 85. JUSA: Cost 99, Risk 92, Mission 84, Tradability 58, Holdings 84, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for GUSE, JUSA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGUSEJUSA
Cost30% weightA97A99Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA84
Risk15% weightA94HigherA92
Tradability15% weightC46B58Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherA84
Durability5% weightA85HigherA76

Rank among US Active Growth funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GUSE and JUSA are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Growth⁠

Category · 90 funds
See all 90 ›

JUSA ranks 1st and GUSE 2nd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.

  1. Rank 1AJUSAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2AGUSEGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETFScore 84
  3. Rank 3ALRGCAB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETFScore 81

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GUSEAGoldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF

JUSAAJPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF

In short

GUSE Goldman's fundamental stock pickers hunting long-term growth in US companies, for 0.30% a year. The strategy dates to 2008 and charges well under the typical active US growth fund.

JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.

Stated mandate

GUSE The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in companies that the Investment Adviser believes are positioned for long-term growth.

JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.

Why people hold it

  • GUSE Charges 0.30% a year, against a 0.54% median for its active US growth cohort. Cheap, for stock picking.
  • Actively run with no index to shadow. Managers hold companies they judge positioned for long-term growth, so the portfolio can look different from a large-cap benchmark.
  • Inception dates to 2008, so the strategy has run through multiple market cycles, not one long rally.
  • One of the stronger implementations in a crowded field of active US growth funds.
  • JUSA 0.18% a year with no waiver propping it up, below its category median. GUSE charges 0.30% and LRGC 0.39% for similar enhanced-index work; FELG ties it at 0.18%.
  • Active where it counts, plain where it doesn't: bottom-up stock picks across roughly 300 large caps, with sector mix and risk profile kept close to the S&P 500.jpmorgan.com
  • Stands among the strongest implementations in a 90-fund peer group of active large-cap funds, helped by a low fee and tightly managed risk.

Worth knowing

  • GUSE Trades thinly next to the category's heavyweights. Spreads can be wider, which bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Two peers in the same top tier undercut it on fee: JUSA at 0.12% and FELG at 0.18%. Price is not where this one stands out.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not monthly. Growth of capital is the stated goal, not an income stream.
  • JUSA Launched in March 2025, so there is only a short live record on this ticker to judge.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can run wider than the giant index funds', especially in fast markets.
  • Tracking the S&P 500's sector weights limits how far results can stray from the benchmark in either direction. This is a nudge on the index, not a different bet.jpmorgan.com

Full GUSE profile⁠

Full JUSA profile⁠

GUSE vs JUSA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GUSE vs JUSA Cost

Overpaying GUSE vs JUSA

$2,400

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GUSE 0.30%

    $6,149

  • JUSA 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GUSE 0.30%
  • JUSA 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GUSE $6,149JUSA $3,749

Year by year

YearGUSEJUSAOverpaying
10$545$328$217
20$2,113$1,281$832
30$6,149$3,749$2,400

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%GUSE
  • 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Growth funds
  • Median 0.55%

JUSA cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE 3rd cheapest of 90 funds

GUSE vs JUSA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GUSE No data
JUSA 0.72%
Payout (12M)
GUSE No data
JUSA $0.49
Last payment
GUSE $0.30
JUSA $0.13
Ex-dividend
GUSE Dec 23, 2025
JUSA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
GUSE Dec 30, 2025
JUSA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
GUSE Irregular
JUSA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

GUSEIrregular · 1 paymentAll GUSE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
JUSAQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll JUSA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.15; Dec 16, 2025 $0.18; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.06; Sep 22, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

GUSE vs JUSA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GUSE No dataJUSA 11.6%since Apr 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GUSE No dataJUSA 1.41since Apr 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GUSE No dataJUSA −14.0%since Mar 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GUSE 0.93JUSA 0.98

GUSE and JUSA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GUSEAvsLRGCA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsLRGCA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsFELGA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsFELGA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GUSEAvsGQQQA

    Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF · Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JUSAAvsGQQQA

    JPMorgan U.S. Research Enhanced Large Cap ETF · Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.