JUSA ranks 1st and LRGC 3rd of 90 funds in the US Active Growth Category.
JUSA vs LRGC
JUSA −0.21pt a year
0.18%0.39%
JUSA 2.9×the volume
98.8K34.1K
JUSA vs LRGC Performance
+10.8%+9.5%
- JUSA 0.18%, better
- LRGC 0.39%
- JUSA $745M
- LRGC $1.37B
- JUSA +10.8%, better
- LRGC +9.5%
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LRGC 0.53%
- JUSA 263
- LRGC 72
- JUSA 98.8K sh, better
- LRGC 34.1K sh
- JUSA $67.75
- LRGC $85.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JUSA | LRGC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A84Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A92Higher | A90 |
| Tradability | B58 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | A77 |
| Durability | A76 | A78Higher |
Rank among US Active Growth funds
Same Category. JUSA and LRGC are both graded against the same 90 US Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JUSAA
LRGCA
In short
JUSA Active stock picking in index clothing: J.P. Morgan analysts tilt roughly 300 large caps while sector weights and risk stay close to the S&P 500, for 0.18% a year with no waiver attached.
LRGC AB's stock pickers in an ETF wrapper: roughly 70 large-cap US names picked with fundamental research plus quant screens, measured against the S&P 500. Active conviction, priced under the typical active peer.
Stated mandate
JUSA The fund seeks capital appreciation through active, fundamental, bottom-up selection of large-cap U.S. equities. It targets companies with strong long-term earnings potential and attractive valuations relative to peers.
LRGC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in equities of large-capitalization U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JUSA vs LRGC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JUSA vs LRGC Cost
Overpaying LRGC vs JUSA
$4,149
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JUSA 0.18%
$3,749
LRGC 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JUSA | LRGC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $705 | $377 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $2,725 | $1,444 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $7,898 | $4,149 |
- 0.18%JUSA, cheaper
- 0.39%LRGC
- Middle half of US Active Growth funds
- Median 0.55%
JUSA cheapest of 90 funds
LRGC 14th cheapest of 90 funds
JUSA vs LRGC Dividends
- JUSA 0.72%, better
- LRGC 0.53%
- JUSA $0.49
- LRGC $0.45
- JUSA $0.13
- LRGC $0.45
- JUSA Sep 22, 2026
- LRGC Dec 17, 2025
- JUSA Sep 24, 2026
- LRGC Dec 18, 2025
- JUSA Quarterly
- LRGC Annual
Distribution history
JUSA vs LRGC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JUSA 11.6%LRGC 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- JUSA 1.41LRGC 1.26
- Worst fall
- JUSA −14.0%LRGC −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- JUSA 0.98LRGC 1.00
JUSA and LRGC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


