TSDD ranks 2nd and AMDD 21st of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMDD vs TSDD
0.0%by weight
TSDD −0.47pt a year
1.45%0.98%
TSDD 9.3×the volume
1.19M11M
AMDD vs TSDD Performance
−63.9%−26.1%
- AMDD 1.45%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- AMDD $17M
- TSDD $30M
- AMDD −63.9%
- TSDD −26.1%, better
- AMDD 11.25%, better
- TSDD 10.76%
- AMDD 4
- TSDD 1
- AMDD 1.19M sh
- TSDD 11M sh, better
- AMDD $26.43
- TSDD $6.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMDD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A98Higher |
| Risk | D39 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B63 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMDD and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMDDB
TSDDA
In short
AMDD A one-day short on AMD, bought like any stock. AMDD aims for 100% of the inverse of AMD's daily move: no margin account, no borrowed shares, and no extra leverage stacked on top.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
AMDD The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse of AMD’s daily performance, before fees and expenses.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMDD vs TSDD Holdings
How AMDD and TSDD differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMDD and 0.0% of TSDD.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMDD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AMDDMore in TSDD | AMDD | TSDD |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AMDD2247.7%
- TSDD200.0%
- AMDD2
- TSDD1
Asset class
- AMDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AMDD2
- In both0
- Only in TSDD1
Only in AMDD
2 securities, 100% of AMDD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506302.02%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut162.55%
Only in TSDD
1 security, 100% of TSDD by weight
- Tsla200.04%
Weight gaps
AMDD and TSDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMDD vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying AMDD vs TSDD
$7,208
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMDD 1.45%
$25,570
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMDD | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,509 | $1,729 | $780 |
| 20 | $9,241 | $6,504 | $2,737 |
| 30 | $25,570 | $18,362 | $7,208 |
- 1.45%AMDD
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
AMDD 30th cheapest of 43 funds
AMDD vs TSDD Dividends
- AMDD 11.25%, better
- TSDD 10.76%
- AMDD $3.20
- TSDD $0.65
- AMDD $0.24
- TSDD $0.65
- AMDD Sep 22, 2026
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- AMDD Sep 29, 2026
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- AMDD Quarterly
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
AMDD vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMDD 65.0%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMDD −1.68TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- AMDD −93.4%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AMDD −2.52TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 1.45% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.45% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.45% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.