TSLS ranks 3rd and AMDD 21st of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMDD vs TSLS
TSLS −0.50pt a year
1.45%0.95%
AMDD 2.9×the volume
1.19M410K
AMDD vs TSLS Performance
−63.9%0.0%
- AMDD 1.45%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- AMDD $17M
- TSLS $40M
- AMDD −63.9%
- TSLS 0.0%, better
- AMDD 11.25%, better
- TSLS 3.14%
- AMDD 4
- TSLS 4
- AMDD 1.19M sh, better
- TSLS 410K sh
- AMDD $26.43
- TSLS $50.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMDD | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A87 |
| Risk | D39 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | C48Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B63 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMDD and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMDDB
TSLSA
In short
AMDD A one-day short on AMD, bought like any stock. AMDD aims for 100% of the inverse of AMD's daily move: no margin account, no borrowed shares, and no extra leverage stacked on top.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
AMDD The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse of AMD’s daily performance, before fees and expenses.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMDD vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMDD vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying AMDD vs TSLS
$7,701
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMDD 1.45%
$25,570
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMDD | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,509 | $1,678 | $831 |
| 20 | $9,241 | $6,322 | $2,919 |
| 30 | $25,570 | $17,869 | $7,701 |
- 1.45%AMDD
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
AMDD 30th cheapest of 43 funds
AMDD vs TSLS Dividends
- AMDD 11.25%, better
- TSLS 3.14%
- AMDD $3.20
- TSLS $1.57
- AMDD $0.24
- TSLS $0.40
- AMDD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- AMDD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- AMDD Quarterly
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
AMDD vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMDD 65.0%TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMDD −1.68TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- AMDD −93.4%TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AMDD −2.52TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.45% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.45% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.45% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.