AMDG ranks 4th and GRAG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMDG vs GRAG
8.1%by weight
GRAG −0.03pt a year
0.78%0.75%
AMDG 1.00×the volume
48.9K48.8K
AMDG vs GRAG Performance
+95.9%−62.1%
- AMDG 0.78%
- GRAG 0.75%, better
- AMDG $20M
- GRAG $3M
- AMDG +28.5%
- GRAG
- AMDG 5
- GRAG 4
- AMDG 48.9K sh, better
- GRAG 48.8K sh
- AMDG $79.93
- GRAG $4.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMDG | GRAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A90Higher | B67 |
| Risk | A74Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B65Higher | C44 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMDG and GRAG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMDGB
GRAGC
In short
AMDG The low-cost way to rent 2x AMD. Total return swaps with several banks, rebalanced at every close, targeting double AMD's daily move, at a flat 0.78% with no waiver.
GRAG Two times Grab Holdings' daily move, in an ETF you can hold in a plain brokerage account. It costs 0.75%, under the usual toll for single-stock leverage, and the exposure resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon instrument.
Stated mandate
AMDG The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. stock (AMD).
GRAG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% (2x) of Grab Holdings Limited stock's daily performance before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMDG vs GRAG Holdings
How AMDG and GRAG differ
8.1%
Shared holdings make up 17.6% of AMDG and 8.1% of GRAG.
About this figure: AMDG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
GRAG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings8.1%
Sector
No Sector split for AMDG and GRAG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AMDGMore in GRAG | Gap | AMDG | GRAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AMDG217.6%
- GRAG208.1%
- AMDG1
- GRAG1
Asset class
- AMDG
- Stocks
- GRAG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in AMDG0
- In both1
- Only in GRAG0
Only in AMDG
0 securities, 0.0% of AMDG by weight
Only in GRAG
0 securities, 0.0% of GRAG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AMDGMore in GRAG | Gap | AMDG | GRAG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | AMDG +9.44 points | 17.56% | 8.12% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMDG vs GRAG Cost
Overpaying AMDG vs GRAG
$520
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMDG 0.78%
$15,002
GRAG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMDG | GRAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,336 | $52 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $5,078 | $190 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $14,482 | $520 |
- 0.78%AMDG
- 0.75%GRAG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GRAG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
AMDG 142nd cheapest of 315 funds
AMDG vs GRAG Dividends
- AMDG
- GRAG None
- AMDG $2.97
- GRAG
- AMDG Dec 30, 2025
- GRAG
- AMDG Jan 2, 2026
- GRAG
- AMDG Irregular
- GRAG
Distribution history
AMDG vs GRAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMDG 206.3%GRAG
- Return per unit of risk
- AMDG 1.20GRAG
- Worst fall
- AMDG −65.5%GRAG
- Market sensitivity
- AMDG 5.60GRAG 1.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.