AMZD ranks 4th and SNDQ 25th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs SNDQ
0.0%by weight
AMZD −0.47pt a year
1.02%1.49%
SNDQ 2.0×the volume
12.2M23.8M
AMZD vs SNDQ Performance
+9.7%−26.9%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- SNDQ 1.49%
- AMZD $18M
- SNDQ $112M
- AMZD −5.6%
- SNDQ
- AMZD 2.71%
- SNDQ
- AMZD 3
- SNDQ 2
- AMZD 12.2M sh
- SNDQ 23.8M sh, better
- AMZD $9.03
- SNDQ $23.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | SNDQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | A74 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A70Higher | C53 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and SNDQ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
SNDQC
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs SNDQ Holdings
How AMZD and SNDQ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMZD and 0.0% of SNDQ.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMZD.
Concentration
- AMZD1816.7%
- SNDQ139.8%
- AMZD1
- SNDQ1
Asset class
- AMZD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- SNDQ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AMZD1
- In both0
- Only in SNDQ1
Only in AMZD
1 security, 100% of AMZD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506597.32%
Only in SNDQ
1 security, 70.2% of SNDQ by weight
- Cfd Sandisk Corp70.16%
Weight gaps
AMZD and SNDQ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs SNDQ Cost
Overpaying SNDQ vs AMZD
$7,129
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
SNDQ 1.49%
$26,141
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | SNDQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $2,574 | $777 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $9,464 | $2,718 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $26,141 | $7,129 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 1.49%SNDQ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
SNDQ 31st cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs SNDQ Dividends
- AMZD 2.71%
- SNDQ
- AMZD $0.24
- SNDQ None
- AMZD $0.05
- SNDQ
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- SNDQ
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- SNDQ
- AMZD Quarterly
- SNDQ
Distribution history
AMZD vs SNDQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%SNDQ
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86SNDQ
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%SNDQ
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.26SNDQ −9.52
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.