Skip to content

AOA vs BAMO

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

AOAANYSE Arca

Brookstone Opportunities ETF

BAMODCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

AOA −0.90pt a year

AOA0.15%BAMO1.05%

Avg volume · 30D

AOA 31.0×the volume

AOA143KBAMO4.61K

3Y return · a year

AOA +4.6pt

AOA+16.5%BAMO+11.9%

AOA vs BAMO Performance

Nov 6, 2025 – Nov 6, 2026

+9.4%AOA+7.5%BAMO

Nov 6, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026. AOA +9.4%. BAMO +7.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AOA 0.15%, better
BAMO 1.05%
Fund size
AOA $3.26B
BAMO $44M
1Y total return
AOA +9.4%, better
BAMO +7.5%
Yield (12M)
AOA 2.23%, better
BAMO 1.39%
Holdings
AOA 34511
BAMO 6
Avg volume (30D)
AOA 143K sh, better
BAMO 4.61K sh
NAV per share
AOA $94.55
BAMO $34.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AOA: Cost 93, Risk 53, Mission 100, Tradability 96, Holdings 81, Durability 98. BAMO: Cost 11, Risk 58, Mission 40, Tradability 55, Holdings 34, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for AOA, BAMO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAOABAMO
Cost30% weightA93HigherF11
Mission25% weightA100HigherC40
Risk15% weightC53B58Higher
Tradability15% weightA96HigherB55
Holdings10% weightA81HigherD34
Durability5% weightA98HigherC52

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AOA and BAMO are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 36 funds
See all 36 ›

AOA ranks 2nd and BAMO 29th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 3AIRTRiShares LifePath Retirement ETFScore 86
  4. Rank 28DWTIPWisdomTree Inflation Plus FundScore 39
  5. Rank 29DBAMOBrookstone Opportunities ETFScore 36
  6. Rank 30DBAMABrookstone Active ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AOAAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

BAMODBrookstone Opportunities ETF

In short

AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.

BAMO A go-anywhere tactical blend: the adviser builds the whole thing out of just 5 to 10 outside ETFs and can swing from all-in on stocks to all the way out into Treasuries and cash as its read on markets changes.

Stated mandate

AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.

BAMO Seeks total return. It actively allocates through unaffiliated ETFs across foreign and domestic stocks of any capitalization, bonds, and cash based on the adviser’s relative outlook.

Why people hold it

  • AOA One trade buys a handful of underlying iShares index funds spanning global stocks and bonds, with the 80/20 split set by index rule rather than a manager's judgment call.ishares.comspglobal.com
  • Costs 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (0.19% gross), below the median fee in its allocation category.
  • Live since November 2008 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it has run the same target-risk mandate through the financial crisis and everything after.ishares.com
  • Among the strongest implementations in a crowded field of allocation funds, and it pays out quarterly.
  • BAMO Truly go-anywhere: stocks of any size across the US, developed foreign and emerging markets, plus bonds and cash, weighted by the adviser's relative outlook rather than a fixed glide path.sec.gov
  • The prospectus caps it at 5 to 10 ETF positions, so you can see what the manager actually believes at a glance instead of decoding a 500-line portfolio.sec.gov
  • The bond side stays plain by design: U.S. Treasury ETFs or broad-based index fixed income ETFs, even when the equity side turns tactical. Distributions are quarterly.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • AOA Eighty percent equity means it rides global stock swings closely. The 20% bond sleeve softens drawdowns rather than stopping them.spglobal.com
  • That 0.15% is net of a contractual waiver through November 30, 2026. The gross 0.19% is the figure that applies if the waiver is not renewed.
  • Cheaper one-ticket rivals now exist: UCBG at 0.06% and IRTR at 0.08%. IRTR also glides its risk down over time, while AOA's 80/20 stays put.
  • BAMO Costs 1.05% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027 (1.12% gross), above the category median, and the ETFs it holds charge their own fees on top. AOA runs 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026.
  • It can be all in or all out of stocks and may hold leveraged ETFs, so results follow the adviser's timing calls rather than a published benchmark.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so the gap between buy and sell prices can run wider than at the category's index-tracking giants.

Full AOA profile⁠

Full BAMO profile⁠

AOA vs BAMO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AOA vs BAMO Cost

Overpaying BAMO vs AOA

$16,358

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AOA 0.15%

    $3,137

  • BAMO 1.05%

    $19,495

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AOA 0.15%
  • BAMO 1.05%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BAMO $19,495AOA $3,137

Year by year

YearAOABAMOOverpaying
10$274$1,847$1,573
20$1,071$6,927$5,856
30$3,137$19,495$16,358

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%AOA, cheaper
  • 1.05%BAMO
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.61%

AOA 3rd cheapest of 36 funds

BAMO 32nd cheapest of 36 funds

AOA vs BAMO Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Yield (12M)
AOA 2.23%, better
BAMO 1.39%
Payout (12M)
AOA $2.11
BAMO $0.47
Last payment
AOA $0.30
BAMO $0.11
Ex-dividend
AOA Oct 2, 2026
BAMO Aug 28, 2026
Paid on
AOA Oct 7, 2026
BAMO Sep 4, 2026
Frequency
AOA Quarterly
BAMO Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AOAQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll AOA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Apr 4, 2017 $0.13; Jul 6, 2017 $0.40; Oct 3, 2017 $0.16; Dec 28, 2017 $2.06; Apr 3, 2018 $0.15; Jul 3, 2018 $0.48; Oct 2, 2018 $0.17; Dec 28, 2018 $0.35; Apr 2, 2019 $0.18; Jul 2, 2019 $0.55; Oct 2, 2019 $0.18; Dec 24, 2019 $0.54; Apr 2, 2020 $0.16; Jul 2, 2020 $0.36; Oct 2, 2020 $0.16; Dec 24, 2020 $0.42; Apr 5, 2021 $0.11; Jul 2, 2021 $0.38; Oct 4, 2021 $0.15; Dec 23, 2021 $0.57; Apr 4, 2022 $0.17; Jul 5, 2022 $0.51; Oct 4, 2022 $0.20; Dec 23, 2022 $0.38; Apr 4, 2023 $0.18; Jul 5, 2023 $0.50; Oct 3, 2023 $0.22; Dec 22, 2023 $0.63; Apr 2, 2024 $0.21; Jul 2, 2024 $0.55; Oct 2, 2024 $0.27; Dec 20, 2024 $0.74; Apr 2, 2025 $0.22; Jul 2, 2025 $0.62; Oct 2, 2025 $0.25; Dec 23, 2025 $0.86; Apr 2, 2026 $0.28; Jul 2, 2026 $0.68; Oct 2, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
BAMOQuarterly · 13 paymentsAll BAMO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Nov 29, 2023 $0.0091; Dec 26, 2023 $0.12; Feb 28, 2024 $0.01; May 31, 2024 $0.12; Aug 30, 2024 $0.12; Nov 29, 2024 $0.12; Dec 27, 2024 $0.11; May 28, 2025 $0.08; Aug 29, 2025 $0.14; Nov 28, 2025 $0.16; Dec 26, 2025 $0.12; May 28, 2026 $0.08; Aug 28, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

AOA vs BAMO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AOA 9.6%BAMO 7.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AOA 1.37, betterBAMO 1.13
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AOA −23.6%BAMO −12.7%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AOA 1.06BAMO 0.58

AOA and BAMO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AOAAvsUCBGA

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMODvsUCBGA

    Brookstone Opportunities ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.05% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AOAAvsIRTRA

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMODvsIRTRA

    Brookstone Opportunities ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.05% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AOAAvsINCEA

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMODvsINCEA

    Brookstone Opportunities ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.05% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.