AOA ranks 2nd and BAMO 29th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
AOA vs BAMO
AOA −0.90pt a year
0.15%1.05%
AOA 31.0×the volume
143K4.61K
AOA +4.6pt
+16.5%+11.9%
AOA vs BAMO Performance
+9.4%+7.5%
- AOA 0.15%, better
- BAMO 1.05%
- AOA $3.26B
- BAMO $44M
- AOA +9.4%, better
- BAMO +7.5%
- AOA 2.23%, better
- BAMO 1.39%
- AOA 34511
- BAMO 6
- AOA 143K sh, better
- BAMO 4.61K sh
- AOA $94.55
- BAMO $34.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOA | BAMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A100Higher | C40 |
| Risk | C53 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D34 |
| Durability | A98Higher | C52 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. AOA and BAMO are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOAA
BAMOD
In short
AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.
BAMO A go-anywhere tactical blend: the adviser builds the whole thing out of just 5 to 10 outside ETFs and can swing from all-in on stocks to all the way out into Treasuries and cash as its read on markets changes.
Stated mandate
AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.
BAMO Seeks total return. It actively allocates through unaffiliated ETFs across foreign and domestic stocks of any capitalization, bonds, and cash based on the adviser’s relative outlook.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOA vs BAMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOA vs BAMO Cost
Overpaying BAMO vs AOA
$16,358
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOA 0.15%
$3,137
BAMO 1.05%
$19,495
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOA | BAMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,847 | $1,573 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $6,927 | $5,856 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $19,495 | $16,358 |
- 0.15%AOA, cheaper
- 1.05%BAMO
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.61%
AOA 3rd cheapest of 36 funds
BAMO 32nd cheapest of 36 funds
AOA vs BAMO Dividends
- AOA 2.23%, better
- BAMO 1.39%
- AOA $2.11
- BAMO $0.47
- AOA $0.30
- BAMO $0.11
- AOA Oct 2, 2026
- BAMO Aug 28, 2026
- AOA Oct 7, 2026
- BAMO Sep 4, 2026
- AOA Quarterly
- BAMO Quarterly
Distribution history
AOA vs BAMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOA 9.6%BAMO 7.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AOA 1.37, betterBAMO 1.13
- Worst fall
- AOA −23.6%BAMO −12.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AOA 1.06BAMO 0.58
AOA and BAMO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
