INCE ranks 4th and BAMO 29th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
BAMO vs INCE
INCE −0.76pt a year
1.05%0.29%
INCE 10.3×the volume
4.61K47.6K
INCE +5.2pt
+11.9%+17.1%
BAMO vs INCE Performance
+7.5%+21.1%
- BAMO 1.05%
- INCE 0.29%, better
- BAMO $44M
- INCE $360M
- BAMO +7.5%
- INCE +21.1%, better
- BAMO 1.39%
- INCE 5.08%, better
- BAMO 6
- INCE 116
- BAMO 4.61K sh
- INCE 47.6K sh, better
- BAMO $34.15
- INCE $67.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMO | INCE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A82Higher |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | B58 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A73Higher |
| Durability | C52 | A85Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. BAMO and INCE are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMOD
INCEA
In short
BAMO A go-anywhere tactical blend: the adviser builds the whole thing out of just 5 to 10 outside ETFs and can swing from all-in on stocks to all the way out into Treasuries and cash as its read on markets changes.
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
Stated mandate
BAMO Seeks total return. It actively allocates through unaffiliated ETFs across foreign and domestic stocks of any capitalization, bonds, and cash based on the adviser’s relative outlook.
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMO vs INCE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMO vs INCE Cost
Overpaying BAMO vs INCE
$13,543
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMO 1.05%
$19,495
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMO | INCE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $527 | $1,320 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $2,044 | $4,883 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $5,952 | $13,543 |
- 1.05%BAMO
- 0.29%INCE, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.61%
INCE 6th cheapest of 36 funds
BAMO 32nd cheapest of 36 funds
BAMO vs INCE Dividends
- BAMO 1.39%
- INCE 5.08%, better
- BAMO $0.47
- INCE $3.42
- BAMO $0.11
- INCE $0.30
- BAMO Aug 28, 2026
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- BAMO Sep 4, 2026
- INCE Nov 4, 2026
- BAMO Quarterly
- INCE Monthly
Distribution history
BAMO vs INCE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMO 7.4%, betterINCE 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMO 1.13INCE 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- BAMO −12.7%INCE −18.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMO 0.58INCE 0.60
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.