AOA ranks 2nd and LQ 26th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
AOA vs LQ
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.15%0.15%
AOA 215.6×the volume
135K624
AOA vs LQ Performance
−0.3%+1.9%
- AOA 0.15%
- LQ 0.15%
- AOA $3.32B
- LQ $2M
- AOA +10.1%
- LQ
- AOA 2.19%
- LQ
- AOA 34240
- LQ 1
- AOA 135K sh, better
- LQ 624 sh
- AOA $96.21
- LQ $23.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOA | LQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93 | A93 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | A81 | |
| Durability | A98Higher | D36 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. AOA and LQ are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOAA
LQC
In short
AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.
LQ Simplify's alternatives lineup (managed futures, commodities, currencies, energy, tail hedges) in one ticker, held through year-plus swaps so gains at expiry can qualify as long-term capital gains. The tax plumbing is the product.
Stated mandate
AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.
LQ The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a diversified, actively managed portfolio of alternative strategies designed to diversify traditional stock-and-bond portfolios and reduce the tax impact of investing.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOA vs LQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOA vs LQ Cost
Same expense ratio
$3,137
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOA 0.15%
$3,137
LQ 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOA | LQ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $274 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,071 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $3,137 |
- 0.15%AOA
- 0.15%LQ
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
AOA 3rd cheapest of 37 funds
LQ 3rd cheapest of 37 funds
AOA vs LQ Dividends
- AOA 2.19%
- LQ
- AOA $2.11
- LQ
- AOA $0.30
- LQ $0.25
- AOA Oct 2, 2026
- LQ Sep 25, 2026
- AOA Oct 7, 2026
- LQ Sep 30, 2026
- AOA Quarterly
- LQ Quarterly
Distribution history
AOA vs LQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOA 9.6%LQ
- Return per unit of risk
- AOA 1.37LQ
- Worst fall
- AOA −23.6%LQ
- Market sensitivity
- AOA 1.06LQ 1.29
AOA and LQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

