INCE ranks 4th and LQ 26th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
INCE vs LQ
LQ −0.14pt a year
0.29%0.15%
INCE 75.9×the volume
47.3K624
INCE vs LQ Performance
+2.6%+1.9%
- INCE 0.29%
- LQ 0.15%, better
- INCE $368M
- LQ $2M
- INCE +22.6%
- LQ
- INCE 5.28%
- LQ
- INCE 112
- LQ 1
- INCE 47.3K sh, better
- LQ 624 sh
- INCE $68.80
- LQ $23.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INCE | LQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | A74 | |
| Durability | A85Higher | D36 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. INCE and LQ are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INCEA
LQC
In short
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
LQ Simplify's alternatives lineup (managed futures, commodities, currencies, energy, tail hedges) in one ticker, held through year-plus swaps so gains at expiry can qualify as long-term capital gains. The tax plumbing is the product.
Stated mandate
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
LQ The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a diversified, actively managed portfolio of alternative strategies designed to diversify traditional stock-and-bond portfolios and reduce the tax impact of investing.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INCE vs LQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INCE vs LQ Cost
Overpaying INCE vs LQ
$2,815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
LQ 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INCE | LQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $274 | $253 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $1,071 | $973 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $3,137 | $2,815 |
- 0.29%INCE
- 0.15%LQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
LQ 3rd cheapest of 37 funds
INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds
INCE vs LQ Dividends
- INCE 5.28%
- LQ
- INCE $3.64
- LQ
- INCE $0.30
- LQ $0.25
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- LQ Sep 25, 2026
- INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
- LQ Sep 30, 2026
- INCE Monthly
- LQ Quarterly
Distribution history
INCE vs LQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INCE 10.8%LQ
- Return per unit of risk
- INCE 1.28LQ
- Worst fall
- INCE −18.4%LQ
- Market sensitivity
- INCE 0.60LQ 1.29
INCE and LQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
