IRTR ranks 3rd and LQ 26th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
IRTR vs LQ
IRTR −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
IRTR 20.4×the volume
12.7K624
IRTR vs LQ Performance
0.0%+1.9%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- LQ 0.15%
- IRTR $60M
- LQ $2M
- IRTR +5.1%
- LQ
- IRTR 3.17%
- LQ
- IRTR 29140
- LQ 1
- IRTR 12.7K sh, better
- LQ 624 sh
- IRTR $31.52
- LQ $23.94
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IRTR | LQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A93 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A82Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | A80 | |
| Durability | B56Higher | D36 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. IRTR and LQ are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IRTRA
LQC
In short
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
LQ Simplify's alternatives lineup (managed futures, commodities, currencies, energy, tail hedges) in one ticker, held through year-plus swaps so gains at expiry can qualify as long-term capital gains. The tax plumbing is the product.
Stated mandate
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
LQ The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a diversified, actively managed portfolio of alternative strategies designed to diversify traditional stock-and-bond portfolios and reduce the tax impact of investing.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IRTR vs LQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IRTR vs LQ Cost
Overpaying LQ vs IRTR
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
LQ 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IRTR | LQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- 0.15%LQ
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
LQ 3rd cheapest of 37 funds
IRTR vs LQ Dividends
- IRTR 3.17%
- LQ
- IRTR $1.00
- LQ
- IRTR $0.08
- LQ $0.25
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- LQ Sep 25, 2026
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- LQ Sep 30, 2026
- IRTR Monthly
- LQ Quarterly
Distribution history
IRTR vs LQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IRTR 7.3%LQ
- Return per unit of risk
- IRTR 1.14LQ
- Worst fall
- IRTR −6.3%LQ
- Market sensitivity
- IRTR 0.47LQ 1.29
IRTR and LQ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
