TSLS ranks 3rd and APLZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
APLZ vs TSLS
TSLS −0.54pt a year
1.49%0.95%
TSLS 3.1×the volume
134K410K
APLZ vs TSLS Performance
+44.0%−23.8%
- APLZ 1.49%
- TSLS 0.95%, better
- APLZ $5M
- TSLS $39M
- APLZ
- TSLS +1.0%
- APLZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- APLZ 2
- TSLS 4
- APLZ 134K sh
- TSLS 410K sh, better
- APLZ $35.31
- TSLS $50.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | APLZ | TSLS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A87 |
| Risk | C40 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D32 | A82Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. APLZ and TSLS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
APLZC
TSLSA
In short
APLZ A one-day trade in a fund wrapper: APLZ aims to deliver two times the inverse of Applied Digital's daily move, so bears can lean against the AI data-center story without a margin account or a stock loan.
TSLS The plain short on Tesla: TSLS aims for -1x the stock's daily move, with no leverage stacked on top. Among the small group of Tesla bear funds, it is the cheapest, and the one that dials risk down rather than up.
Stated mandate
APLZ The fund seeks daily results equal to two times the inverse performance of Applied Digital Corporation common shares, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a one-trading-day objective rather than a longer holding period.
TSLS The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results by maintaining short exposure to TSLA of approximately -100% of its net assets and generally rebalancing that exposure each trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
APLZ vs TSLS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
APLZ vs TSLS Cost
Overpaying APLZ vs TSLS
$8,272
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
APLZ 1.49%
$26,141
TSLS 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | APLZ | TSLS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,574 | $1,678 | $896 |
| 20 | $9,464 | $6,322 | $3,142 |
| 30 | $26,141 | $17,869 | $8,272 |
- 1.49%APLZ
- 0.95%TSLS, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSLS 2nd cheapest of 43 funds
APLZ 31st cheapest of 43 funds
APLZ vs TSLS Dividends
- APLZ
- TSLS 3.11%
- APLZ None
- TSLS $1.57
- APLZ
- TSLS $0.40
- APLZ
- TSLS Sep 22, 2026
- APLZ
- TSLS Sep 29, 2026
- APLZ
- TSLS Quarterly
Distribution history
APLZ vs TSLS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- APLZ TSLS 51.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- APLZ TSLS −0.76
- Worst fall
- APLZ TSLS −90.7%
- Market sensitivity
- APLZ −5.76TSLS −1.41
Popular comparisons
- 1.49% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.