Skip to content

APRW vs PSFD

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF

APRWCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFDBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFD −0.25pt a year

APRW0.74%PSFD0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

APRW 15.0×the volume

APRW13.6KPSFD905

5Y return · a year

PSFD +4.1pt

APRW+7.1%PSFD+11.2%

APRW vs PSFD Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+40.9%APRW+70.2%PSFD

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. APRW +40.9%. PSFD +70.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%60%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
APRW 0.74%
PSFD 0.49%, better
Fund size
APRW $203M
PSFD $60M
1Y total return
APRW +10.2%
PSFD +11.1%, better
Yield (12M)
APRW 0.00%
PSFD No data
Holdings
APRW 2
PSFD 4
Avg volume (30D)
APRW 13.6K sh, better
PSFD 905 sh
NAV per share
APRW $37.95
PSFD $40.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

APRW: Cost 37, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 48, Durability 68. PSFD: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for APRW, PSFD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAPRWPSFD
Cost30% weightD37A85Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB64HigherD30
Tradability15% weightA70HigherC45
Holdings10% weightC48Not scored
Durability5% weightB68B68

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. APRW and PSFD are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFD ranks 3rd and APRW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 3BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 3BPSFOPacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 9CJANWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

APRWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF

PSFDBPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

In short

APRW The April door in AllianzIM's buffer lineup: one year of the big S&P 500 tracker ETF's price move, cushioned against the first 20% of losses and capped on the upside, with the clock resetting every April 1.

PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.

Stated mandate

APRW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return over the current one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.

PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • APRW Absorbs the first 20% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's share-price decline over each one-year outcome period, running April 1 to March 31, then resetting.
  • Actively managed, but the contract is mechanical: a stated 20% buffer against one well-known reference ETF, not a manager's stock picks.
  • One month in AllianzIM's rolling series (MAYW runs the May cycle), so start dates can be laddered instead of pinned to a single entry point.
  • Running since 2020, and it lands in the upper half of a crowded field of deep 20% buffer funds on our review.
  • PSFD 0.49% a year versus a 0.74% median for 20%-buffer S&P 500 funds, undercutting the AllianzIM month-series lineup (JANW, APRW, JUNW). When upside is capped, fees come straight out of the ceiling.
  • Deep cushion, clean reset: FLEX options are structured to absorb the first 20% of underlying losses over the roughly one-year period, with a new cap struck at the start of each period.paceretfs.com
  • Siblings run the same recipe on other calendars (PSFM in April, PSFJ in July), so start dates can be staggered instead of pinned to one January strike. Standing sits in the upper half of the deep-buffer group.

Worth knowing

  • APRW Upside is capped, and the cap is reset each April at whatever options cost then. Buffer and cap apply to the full period, so mid-period exits get neither intact.
  • 0.74% is the going rate here, not a discount: PSFM and PSFJ charge 0.49% and PBFR 0.50% for 20% buffers.
  • Modest assets and light trading versus the category's biggest names, so limit orders matter. The structure targets price outcomes, not income.
  • PSFD Thinly traded. Spreads can be wider and larger orders harder to fill than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • No income stream: the fund holds options on an S&P 500 tracker rather than the stocks, and it has not paid a distribution.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap run start to finish of the period and are set before fees and expenses. Shares bought mid-period carry different remaining cushion and headroom.paceretfs.com

Full APRW profile⁠

Full PSFD profile⁠

APRW vs PSFD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

APRW vs PSFD Cost

Overpaying APRW vs PSFD

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • APRW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • PSFD 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • APRW 0.74%
  • PSFD 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530APRW $14,307PSFD $9,792

Year by year

YearAPRWPSFDOverpaying
10$1,319$883$436
20$5,015$3,394$1,621
30$14,307$9,792$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%APRW
  • 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFD cheapest of 24 funds

APRW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

APRW vs PSFD Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
APRW 0.00%
PSFD No data
Payout (12M)
APRW None
PSFD None

Distribution history

Per share, 2020, same scale for both

APRW1 paymentAll APRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2020. Dec 15, 2020 $0.70. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502020
PSFDAll PSFD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

APRW vs PSFD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • APRW
  • PSFD
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: PSFD −14.9% · Jun 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−7.5%−5%−2.5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
APRW 4.8%, betterPSFD 7.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
APRW 1.27PSFD 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
APRW −9.6%, betterPSFD −14.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
APRW 0.35PSFD 0.56

Popular comparisons

  • APRWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • APRWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • APRWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.