EWM ranks 4th and ARGT 10th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
ARGT vs EWM
0.0%by weight
EWM −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.50%
EWM 1.5×the volume
142K214K
ARGT +11.7pt
+14.1%+2.4%
ARGT vs EWM Performance
+161.3%+23.7%
- ARGT 0.59%
- EWM 0.50%, better
- ARGT $620M
- EWM $230M
- ARGT −15.2%
- EWM +7.8%, better
- ARGT 1.30%
- EWM 3.71%, better
- ARGT 25
- EWM 25
- ARGT 142K sh
- EWM 214K sh, better
- ARGT $79.25
- EWM $26.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARGT | EWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A88Higher |
| Mission | C43 | C43 |
| Risk | D32 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | D35 | C41Higher |
| Durability | B60Higher | B56 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. ARGT and EWM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARGTC
EWMB
In short
ARGT Argentina in one ticker. Global X has run this fund since 2011, packing roughly 25 stocks tied to a market most global portfolios skip, and it trades more smoothly than most single-country peers.
EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.
Stated mandate
ARGT The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI All Argentina 25/50 Index.
EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARGT vs EWM Holdings
How ARGT and EWM differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ARGT and 0.0% of EWM.
Level by level
- Country0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector45.9%
Sector
| Sector | More in ARGTMore in EWM | ARGT | EWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | EWM +36.2 points | 14.0% | 50.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | ARGT +30.2 points | 30.2% | 0.0% |
| Energy | ARGT +18.9 points | 22.0% | 3.1% |
| Industrials | EWM +9.1 points | 4.2% | 13.3% |
| Materials | ARGT +3.3 points | 11.8% | 8.5% |
| Health Care | EWM +3.0 points | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| Consumer Staples | EWM +2.8 points | 3.1% | 5.9% |
| Communication | EWM +2.3 points | 3.2% | 5.5% |
| Real Estate | ARGT +1.6 points | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| Utilities | EWM +0.6 points | 9.8% | 10.4% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ARGTMore in EWM | ARGT | EWM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | EWM +100.0 points | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Argentina | ARGT +48.6 points | 48.6% | 0.0% |
| Brazil | ARGT +25.2 points | 25.2% | 0.0% |
| Chile | ARGT +8.9 points | 8.9% | 0.0% |
| Mexico | ARGT +8.1 points | 8.1% | 0.0% |
| Canada | ARGT +3.7 points | 3.7% | 0.0% |
| United States | ARGT +3.5 points | 3.5% | 0.0% |
| Switzerland | ARGT +2.0 points | 2.0% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: ARGT 6% developed, 94% emerging. EWM 0% developed, 100% emerging.
Concentration
- ARGT69.8%
- EWM72.0%
- ARGT25
- EWM22
Asset class
- ARGT
- Equity
- EWM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ARGT25
- In both0
- Only in EWM22
Only in ARGT
25 securities, 100% of ARGT by weight
- Mercadolibre Inc23.03%
- Ypf S.a.-Sponsored Adr10.40%
- Vista Energy Sab De Cv7.16%
- Grupo Financiero Galicia-Adr5.45%
- Pampa Energia Sa-Spon Adr4.78%
- Banco Macro Sa-Adr4.01%
- Ssr Mining Inc3.94%
- Fortuna Mining Corp3.87%
- Transportador Gas-Adr Sp B3.75%
- Embotelladora Andina SA3.42%
- Central Puerto-Sponsored Adr3.41%
- Cencosud SA3.18%
- Telecom Argentina Sa-Sp Adr3.09%
- Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc-A2.99%
- Bbva Argentina Sa-Adr2.86%
- Corp America Airports SA2.49%
- Lithium Argentina AG1.98%
- Cia Cervecerias Unidas SA1.94%
- Irsa -Sp Adr1.57%
- Loma Negra Cia Ind-Spon Adr1.57%
- Cresud S.a.-Spons Adr1.55%
- Emp Distrib Y Comerc Nor-Adr1.33%
- Grupo Supervielle Sa-Sp Adr1.22%
- Adecoagro SA1.03%
- Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp0.05%
Only in EWM
22 securities, 99.8% of EWM by weight
- Public Bank16.00%
- Cimb Group Holdings12.53%
- Malayan Banking11.21%
- Tenaga Nasional6.73%
- Press Metal Aluminium Holdings5.96%
- Gamuda5.77%
- Ytl Power International3.76%
- Ammb Holdings3.62%
- Sd Guthrie3.26%
- Rhb Bank3.20%
- Hong Leong Bank3.18%
- Petronas Gas3.17%
- Ihh Healthcare3.13%
- Sunway Bhd2.76%
- Petronas Chemicals Group2.61%
- Misc2.56%
- Ioi Corporation2.42%
- Kuala Lumpur Kepong2.30%
- Telekom Malaysia2.11%
- Maxis1.78%
- Celcomdigi1.72%
- Myr/Usd0.00%
Weight gaps
ARGT and EWM share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARGT vs EWM Cost
Overpaying ARGT vs EWM
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARGT 0.59%
$11,635
EWM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARGT | EWM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $900 | $158 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,460 | $591 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,979 | $1,656 |
- 0.59%ARGT
- 0.50%EWM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
ARGT 7th cheapest of 21 funds
ARGT vs EWM Dividends
- ARGT 1.30%
- EWM 3.71%, better
- ARGT $1.03
- EWM $1.00
- ARGT $0.33
- EWM $0.57
- ARGT Jun 29, 2026
- EWM Jun 15, 2026
- ARGT Jul 7, 2026
- EWM Jun 18, 2026
- ARGT Twice a year
- EWM Twice a year
Distribution history
ARGT vs EWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ARGT
- EWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARGT 34.9%EWM 13.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ARGT 0.76, betterEWM 0.68
- Worst fall
- ARGT −35.1%EWM −22.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ARGT 0.48EWM 0.46
ARGT and EWM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
