EWW ranks 1st and ARGT 10th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
ARGT vs EWW
EWW −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.50%
EWW 8.2×the volume
142K1.16M
ARGT +7.4pt
+14.1%+6.7%
ARGT vs EWW Performance
+161.3%+81.4%
- ARGT 0.59%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- ARGT $620M
- EWW $1.56B
- ARGT −15.2%
- EWW +15.8%, better
- ARGT 1.30%
- EWW 3.31%, better
- ARGT 25
- EWW 42
- ARGT 142K sh
- EWW 1.16M sh, better
- ARGT $79.25
- EWW $74.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARGT | EWW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A88Higher |
| Mission | C43 | B67Higher |
| Risk | D32 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | A75 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | D35 | B61Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A81Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. ARGT and EWW are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARGTC
EWWA
In short
ARGT Argentina in one ticker. Global X has run this fund since 2011, packing roughly 25 stocks tied to a market most global portfolios skip, and it trades more smoothly than most single-country peers.
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
ARGT The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MSCI All Argentina 25/50 Index.
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARGT vs EWW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARGT vs EWW Cost
Overpaying ARGT vs EWW
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARGT 0.59%
$11,635
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARGT | EWW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $900 | $158 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,460 | $591 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,979 | $1,656 |
- 0.59%ARGT
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
ARGT 7th cheapest of 21 funds
ARGT vs EWW Dividends
- ARGT 1.30%
- EWW 3.31%, better
- ARGT $1.03
- EWW $2.46
- ARGT $0.33
- EWW $1.14
- ARGT Jun 29, 2026
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- ARGT Jul 7, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- ARGT Twice a year
- EWW Twice a year
Distribution history
ARGT vs EWW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ARGT
- EWW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARGT 34.9%EWW 20.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ARGT 0.76, betterEWW 0.56
- Worst fall
- ARGT −35.1%EWW −31.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ARGT 0.48EWW 1.06
ARGT and EWW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
