EWW ranks 1st and EPOL 3rd of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EPOL vs EWW
EWW −0.09pt a year
0.59%0.50%
EWW 2.8×the volume
415K1.16M
EPOL +5.2pt
+11.9%+6.7%
EPOL vs EWW Performance
+123.6%+81.4%
- EPOL 0.59%
- EWW 0.50%, better
- EPOL $1.03B
- EWW $1.56B
- EPOL +34.1%, better
- EWW +15.8%
- EPOL 3.39%, better
- EWW 3.31%
- EPOL 37
- EWW 42
- EPOL 415K sh
- EWW 1.16M sh, better
- EPOL $43.43
- EWW $74.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EPOL | EWW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A88Higher |
| Mission | B63 | B67Higher |
| Risk | A77Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A89 | A100Higher |
| Holdings | C54 | B61Higher |
| Durability | A79 | A81Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EPOL and EWW are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EPOLB
EWWA
In short
EPOL Poland in one ticket. Running since 2010, EPOL holds roughly 30 Polish stocks under MSCI's 25/50 capping rules, and it sits in the upper tier of single-country emerging-market funds.
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
Stated mandate
EPOL The fund seeks to track an index composed of Polish equities.
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EPOL vs EWW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EPOL vs EWW Cost
Overpaying EPOL vs EWW
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EPOL 0.59%
$11,635
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EPOL | EWW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $900 | $158 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $3,460 | $591 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $9,979 | $1,656 |
- 0.59%EPOL
- 0.50%EWW, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EPOL 7th cheapest of 21 funds
EPOL vs EWW Dividends
- EPOL 3.39%, better
- EWW 3.31%
- EPOL $1.47
- EWW $2.46
- EPOL $0.30
- EWW $1.14
- EPOL Jun 15, 2026
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- EPOL Jun 18, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- EPOL Twice a year
- EWW Twice a year
Distribution history
EPOL vs EWW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EPOL
- EWW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EPOL 17.2%, betterEWW 20.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- EPOL 1.64, betterEWW 0.56
- Worst fall
- EPOL −53.6%EWW −31.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EPOL 0.70EWW 1.06
EPOL and EWW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
