EWW ranks 1st and FLMX 2nd of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
EWW vs FLMX
FLMX −0.31pt a year
0.50%0.19%
EWW 113.8×the volume
1.16M10.2K
EWW +0.2pt
+12.7%+12.5%
EWW vs FLMX Performance
+81.4%+80.3%
- EWW 0.50%
- FLMX 0.19%, better
- EWW $1.56B
- FLMX $82M
- EWW +15.8%
- FLMX +16.3%, better
- EWW 3.31%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- EWW 42
- FLMX 39
- EWW 1.16M sh, better
- FLMX 10.2K sh
- EWW $74.42
- FLMX $36.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWW | FLMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A100Higher |
| Mission | B67Higher | B65 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | B61 | B64Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. EWW and FLMX are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWWA
FLMXB
In short
EWW Mexico in one ticker, doing that job since 1996. Roughly 40 of the country's biggest listed names, capped so no single company runs the show, for 0.50% a year.
FLMX Mexico exposure at a discount. Franklin's tracker charges 0.19%, a fraction of what single-country emerging-market funds usually cost, and holds a compact basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
EWW The fund seeks to track an index composed of Mexican equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Mexico.
FLMX The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Mexico Capped Index before fees and expenses through an indexing strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index components or related exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWW vs FLMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWW vs FLMX Cost
Overpaying EWW vs FLMX
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWW 0.50%
$9,979
FLMX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWW | FLMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $347 | $553 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,351 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,952 | $6,027 |
- 0.50%EWW
- 0.19%FLMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLMX cheapest of 21 funds
EWW 3rd cheapest of 21 funds
EWW vs FLMX Dividends
- EWW 3.31%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- EWW $2.46
- FLMX $1.42
- EWW $1.14
- FLMX $0.72
- EWW Jun 15, 2026
- FLMX Jun 26, 2026
- EWW Jun 18, 2026
- FLMX Jul 6, 2026
- EWW Twice a year
- FLMX Twice a year
Distribution history
EWW vs FLMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWW
- FLMX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWW 20.1%FLMX 20.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWW 0.56, betterFLMX 0.55
- Worst fall
- EWW −31.2%, betterFLMX −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EWW 1.06FLMX 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.