EBUF ranks 1st and EOCT 2nd of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.
EBUF vs EOCT
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.89%0.89%
EBUF 1.2×the volume
17.6K14.6K
EBUF vs EOCT Performance
+7.7%+7.4%
- EBUF 0.89%
- EOCT 0.89%
- EBUF $46M
- EOCT $125M
- EBUF +7.7%, better
- EOCT +7.4%
- EBUF 3
- EOCT 3
- EBUF 17.6K sh, better
- EOCT 14.6K sh
- EBUF $30.58
- EOCT $33.43
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EBUF | EOCT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | C47 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A91 |
| Risk | A82Higher | A71 |
| Tradability | A72 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76 | A80Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds
Same Category. EBUF and EOCT are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EBUFB
EOCTB
In short
EBUF Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EBUF points the same machinery at emerging markets: MSCI EM exposure in roughly three-month stretches, with a 10% downside buffer and an upside cap reset at the start of each period.
EOCT Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EOCT aims the same machinery at emerging markets: upside in the iShares MSCI EM ETF up to a cap, with the first 15% of a drop absorbed, then a reset every October.
Stated mandate
EBUF The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy intended to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over each approximately three-month period, subject to a maximum upside return and a 10% downside buffer.
EOCT The fund seeks capped exposure to the iShares MSCI EM ETF while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period. It resets at the end of each period and may be held indefinitely.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EBUF vs EOCT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EBUF vs EOCT Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,872
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EBUF 0.89%
$16,872
EOCT 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EBUF | EOCT |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,576 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $5,953 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $16,872 |
- 0.89%EBUF
- 0.89%EOCT
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
EBUF 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EOCT 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EBUF vs EOCT Dividends
- EBUF None
- EOCT None
Distribution history
EBUF vs EOCT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EBUF 5.5%EOCT 8.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- EBUF 0.85EOCT 1.18
- Worst fall
- EBUF −6.5%EOCT −20.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EBUF 0.21EOCT 0.45
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.