ARKX ranks 3rd and ORBX 4th of 15 funds in the Space Category.
ARKX vs ORBX
ORBX −0.25pt a year
0.75%0.50%
ARKX 8.4×the volume
589K69.7K
ARKX vs ORBX Performance
−2.6%−8.0%
- ARKX 0.75%
- ORBX 0.50%, better
- ARKX $737M
- ORBX $35M
- ARKX −5.0%
- ORBX
- ARKX 33
- ORBX 37
- ARKX 589K sh, better
- ORBX 69.7K sh
- ARKX $29.83
- ORBX $36.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARKX | ORBX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A71Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | C48Higher | D29 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B65 |
Rank among Space funds
Same Category. ARKX and ORBX are both graded against the same 15 Space funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARKXC
ORBXC
In short
ARKX ARK's only space fund, and one of the rare ones in its niche run by stock pickers instead of an index. Roughly 40 global names spanning rockets, the technology that makes them work, and the companies that quietly cash in.
ORBX Space investing usually carries a 0.75% toll. ORBX charges 0.50% for a global basket of roughly 40 companies spanning launch systems, satellites, orbital transport and space tourism. The whole launchpad, not one slice of it.
Stated mandate
ARKX The fund seeks long-term capital growth by actively investing mainly in domestic and foreign equity securities of companies involved in space and defense innovation, including aerospace, enabling technologies, and aerospace beneficiaries.
ORBX ORBX seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Global X Space Tech Index. It invests in companies benefiting from commercialization of the global space economy across launch systems, space technology and components, orbital transport, satellite-enabled services, and space exploration or tourism.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARKX vs ORBX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARKX vs ORBX Cost
Overpaying ARKX vs ORBX
$4,503
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARKX 0.75%
$14,482
ORBX 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARKX | ORBX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $900 | $436 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,460 | $1,618 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,979 | $4,503 |
- 0.75%ARKX
- 0.50%ORBX, cheaper
- Middle half of Space funds
- Median 0.75%
ORBX 5th cheapest of 15 funds
ARKX 8th cheapest of 15 funds
ARKX vs ORBX Dividends
- ARKX None
- ORBX None
Distribution history
ARKX vs ORBX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARKX 29.1%ORBX
- Return per unit of risk
- ARKX 0.96ORBX
- Worst fall
- ARKX −43.5%ORBX
- Market sensitivity
- ARKX 1.64ORBX 1.30
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


