ROKT ranks 2nd and ORBX 4th of 15 funds in the Space Category.
ORBX vs ROKT
ROKT −0.05pt a year
0.50%0.45%
ORBX 3.3×the volume
69.7K21.1K
ORBX vs ROKT Performance
−8.0%−6.2%
- ORBX 0.50%
- ROKT 0.45%, better
- ORBX $35M
- ROKT $156M
- ORBX
- ROKT +27.9%
- ORBX
- ROKT 0.20%
- ORBX 37
- ROKT 38
- ORBX 69.7K sh, better
- ROKT 21.1K sh
- ORBX $36.48
- ROKT $106.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ORBX | ROKT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A86Higher |
| Mission | C44 | |
| Risk | D25 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A87Higher |
Rank among Space funds
Same Category. ORBX and ROKT are both graded against the same 15 Space funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ORBXC
ROKTA
In short
ORBX Space investing usually carries a 0.75% toll. ORBX charges 0.50% for a global basket of roughly 40 companies spanning launch systems, satellites, orbital transport and space tourism. The whole launchpad, not one slice of it.
ROKT Most space funds stop at the atmosphere. ROKT plays both frontiers: rockets and satellites plus the hardware that explores the deep sea, wrapped in an AI-informed S&P Kensho index running since 2018.
Stated mandate
ORBX ORBX seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Global X Space Tech Index. It invests in companies benefiting from commercialization of the global space economy across launch systems, space technology and components, orbital transport, satellite-enabled services, and space exploration or tourism.
ROKT The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index, targeting companies whose products and services support innovation in outer-space and deep-sea exploration through an AI-informed, quantitative index methodology.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ORBX vs ROKT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ORBX vs ROKT Cost
Overpaying ORBX vs ROKT
$938
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ORBX 0.50%
$9,979
ROKT 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ORBX | ROKT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $812 | $88 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,128 | $332 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,041 | $938 |
- 0.50%ORBX
- 0.45%ROKT, cheaper
- Middle half of Space funds
- Median 0.75%
ROKT 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
ORBX 5th cheapest of 15 funds
ORBX vs ROKT Dividends
- ORBX
- ROKT 0.20%
- ORBX None
- ROKT $0.21
- ORBX
- ROKT $0.05
- ORBX
- ROKT Sep 21, 2026
- ORBX
- ROKT Sep 23, 2026
- ORBX
- ROKT Quarterly
Distribution history
ORBX vs ROKT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ORBX ROKT 26.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- ORBX ROKT 1.23
- Worst fall
- ORBX ROKT −27.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ORBX 1.30ROKT 1.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

