UFOX ranks 1st and ORBX 4th of 15 funds in the Space Category.
ORBX vs UFOX
UFOX −0.20pt a year
0.50%0.30%
ORBX 2.2×the volume
69.7K31K
ORBX vs UFOX Performance
−8.0%−2.7%
- ORBX 0.50%
- UFOX 0.30%, better
- ORBX $35M
- UFOX $797M
- ORBX
- UFOX +14.5%
- ORBX
- UFOX 0.48%
- ORBX 37
- UFOX 63
- ORBX 69.7K sh, better
- UFOX 31K sh
- ORBX $36.48
- UFOX $77.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ORBX | UFOX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D25 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A84Higher |
Rank among Space funds
Same Category. ORBX and UFOX are both graded against the same 15 Space funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ORBXC
UFOXA
In short
ORBX Space investing usually carries a 0.75% toll. ORBX charges 0.50% for a global basket of roughly 40 companies spanning launch systems, satellites, orbital transport and space tourism. The whole launchpad, not one slice of it.
UFOX A space theme without the space-theme price tag. UFOX tracks a rules-based index of roughly 60 satellite and connectivity companies for 0.30%, a little over half what the typical global thematic fund charges.
Stated mandate
ORBX ORBX seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Global X Space Tech Index. It invests in companies benefiting from commercialization of the global space economy across launch systems, space technology and components, orbital transport, satellite-enabled services, and space exploration or tourism.
UFOX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Space and Connective Technologies Index. It uses passive indexing and generally invests in the index constituents.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ORBX vs UFOX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ORBX vs UFOX Cost
Overpaying ORBX vs UFOX
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ORBX 0.50%
$9,979
UFOX 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ORBX | UFOX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $545 | $355 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,113 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $6,149 | $3,830 |
- 0.50%ORBX
- 0.30%UFOX, cheaper
- Middle half of Space funds
- Median 0.75%
UFOX cheapest of 15 funds
ORBX 5th cheapest of 15 funds
ORBX vs UFOX Dividends
- ORBX
- UFOX 0.48%
- ORBX None
- UFOX $0.37
- ORBX
- UFOX $0.06
- ORBX
- UFOX Sep 23, 2026
- ORBX
- UFOX Sep 24, 2026
- ORBX
- UFOX Quarterly
Distribution history
ORBX vs UFOX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ORBX UFOX 27.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ORBX UFOX 1.17
- Worst fall
- ORBX UFOX −33.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ORBX 1.30UFOX 1.58
ORBX and UFOX in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
