ARTY ranks 3rd and LRNZ 19th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
ARTY vs LRNZ
ARTY −0.21pt a year
0.47%0.68%
ARTY 174.1×the volume
497K2.86K
ARTY +5.8pt
+9.7%+3.9%
ARTY vs LRNZ Performance
+58.9%+20.9%
- ARTY 0.47%, better
- LRNZ 0.68%
- ARTY $3.65B
- LRNZ $44M
- ARTY +33.9%, better
- LRNZ +17.8%
- ARTY 0.06%, better
- LRNZ 0.00%
- ARTY 65
- LRNZ 26
- ARTY 497K sh, better
- LRNZ 2.86K sh
- ARTY $68.50
- LRNZ $65.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARTY | LRNZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | C41 |
| Mission | B65 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | A75Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C40 |
| Durability | A91Higher | B58 |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. ARTY and LRNZ are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARTYA
LRNZC
In short
ARTY Launched in 2018 as a robotics fund, ARTY switched benchmarks in 2024 and came back as a focused global AI portfolio: about 50 companies across chips, data centers, software and services, at a below-median theme fee.
LRNZ The stock-picker's AI fund. TrueShares launched LRNZ in 2020 and runs a couple dozen high-conviction technology and deep-learning names instead of a broad index basket. Concentrated by design, active by mandate.
Stated mandate
ARTY The fund seeks to track a global index of companies contributing to artificial-intelligence technologies across software, infrastructure, and services.
LRNZ The Fund is an actively managed ETF investing at least 80% of its net assets in common stock of technology, artificial intelligence, and deep learning companies. Its selection process emphasizes companies with substantial technology-related revenue, profit, or research-and-development exposure and competitive advantages in these fields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARTY vs LRNZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARTY vs LRNZ Cost
Overpaying LRNZ vs ARTY
$3,834
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARTY 0.47%
$9,418
LRNZ 0.68%
$13,252
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARTY | LRNZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $1,215 | $368 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $4,633 | $1,372 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $13,252 | $3,834 |
- 0.47%ARTY, cheaper
- 0.68%LRNZ
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
ARTY 6th cheapest of 30 funds
LRNZ 17th cheapest of 30 funds
ARTY vs LRNZ Dividends
- ARTY 0.06%, better
- LRNZ 0.00%
- ARTY $0.04
- LRNZ None
- ARTY $0.04
- LRNZ
- ARTY Jun 15, 2026
- LRNZ
- ARTY Jun 18, 2026
- LRNZ
- ARTY Annual
- LRNZ
Distribution history
ARTY vs LRNZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ARTY
- LRNZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARTY 32.7%, betterLRNZ 34.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARTY 0.92, betterLRNZ 0.80
- Worst fall
- ARTY −50.5%, betterLRNZ −61.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ARTY 2.06LRNZ 1.79
ARTY and LRNZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



