Skip to content

LRNZ vs QTUM

TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF

LRNZCCboe

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUMANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

QTUM −0.28pt a year

LRNZ0.68%QTUM0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

QTUM 126.7×the volume

LRNZ2.86KQTUM362K

5Y return · a year

QTUM +17.6pt

LRNZ+3.9%QTUM+21.5%

LRNZ vs QTUM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+20.9%LRNZ+164.9%QTUM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. LRNZ +20.9%. QTUM +164.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%100%200%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
LRNZ 0.68%
QTUM 0.40%, better
Fund size
LRNZ $44M
QTUM $5.06B
1Y total return
LRNZ +17.8%, better
QTUM +17.5%
Yield (12M)
LRNZ 0.00%
QTUM 1.05%, better
Holdings
LRNZ 26
QTUM 89
Avg volume (30D)
LRNZ 2.86K sh
QTUM 362K sh, better
NAV per share
LRNZ $65.16
QTUM $134.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

LRNZ: Cost 41, Risk 36, Mission 65, Tradability 51, Holdings 40, Durability 58. QTUM: Cost 86, Risk 70, Mission 74, Tradability 70, Holdings 91, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for LRNZ, QTUM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarLRNZQTUM
Cost30% weightC41A86Higher
Mission25% weightB65A74Higher
Risk15% weightD36A70Higher
Tradability15% weightC51A70Higher
Holdings10% weightC40A91Higher
Durability5% weightB58A79Higher

Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. LRNZ and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Artificial Intelligence⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

QTUM ranks 1st and LRNZ 19th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.

  1. Rank 1AQTUMDefiance Quantum ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 1AXAIXXtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 18CAIFDTCW Artificial Intelligence ETFScore 43
  4. Rank 19CLRNZTrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 20CAGIQSoFi Agentic AI ETFScore 41

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

LRNZCTrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF

QTUMADefiance Quantum ETF

In short

LRNZ The stock-picker's AI fund. TrueShares launched LRNZ in 2020 and runs a couple dozen high-conviction technology and deep-learning names instead of a broad index basket. Concentrated by design, active by mandate.

QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.

Stated mandate

LRNZ The Fund is an actively managed ETF investing at least 80% of its net assets in common stock of technology, artificial intelligence, and deep learning companies. Its selection process emphasizes companies with substantial technology-related revenue, profit, or research-and-development exposure and competitive advantages in these fields.

QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.

Why people hold it

  • LRNZ Actively managed and deliberately concentrated at roughly two dozen holdings, so each pick carries real weight rather than being diluted across hundreds of names.
  • Live since 2020, before AI became the loudest trade on the tape. That gives it a multi-year record across very different tech markets, not a post-hype launch.
  • At least 80% of net assets sit in technology, AI and deep-learning companies, screened for real tech revenue, profit or R&D exposure rather than an AI mention in the deck.
  • What is inside matches the label: the portfolio stays close to its stated AI and deep-learning mandate instead of drifting into generic megacap tech.
  • QTUM 0.40% a year against a 0.68% median for its AI-theme cohort, and it undercuts peers like WTAI (0.45%) and ALAI (0.55%).
  • Rules-based by design: it tracks the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index, so no manager is hand-picking which quantum story wins.
  • About 90 holdings across global markets, so the theme rides on a basket instead of two or three pure plays.
  • Size and liquidity back it up: a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the stronger implementations in its thematic peer group.

Worth knowing

  • LRNZ The 0.68% fee lands at the category median, while big index-based rivals such as XAIX (0.35%) and QTUM (0.40%) charge less for a wider basket.
  • Concentration cuts both ways. With only a couple dozen positions, a single stumbling holding moves this fund far more than it would a broad AI index.
  • One of the smaller and more thinly traded funds in the AI group, so spreads and order execution matter more here than with the category heavyweights.
  • QTUM Risk is the softest part of the profile. One narrow, early-stage theme in a single asset class means sharper swings than a broad-market fund.
  • The index covers machine learning as well as quantum, so part of the basket is familiar AI exposure rather than quantum specialists.
  • Distributions come quarterly, but a growth theme like this is not built around income.

Full LRNZ profile⁠

Full QTUM profile⁠

LRNZ vs QTUM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

LRNZ vs QTUM Cost

Overpaying LRNZ vs QTUM

$5,162

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • LRNZ 0.68%

    $13,252

  • QTUM 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • LRNZ 0.68%
  • QTUM 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530LRNZ $13,252QTUM $8,090

Year by year

YearLRNZQTUMOverpaying
10$1,215$723$492
20$4,633$2,793$1,840
30$13,252$8,090$5,162

Expense ratio

  • 0.68%LRNZ
  • 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
  • Median 0.65%

QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds

LRNZ 17th cheapest of 30 funds

LRNZ vs QTUM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
LRNZ 0.00%
QTUM 1.05%, better
Payout (12M)
LRNZ None
QTUM $1.40
Last payment
LRNZ No data
QTUM $0.46
Ex-dividend
LRNZ No data
QTUM Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
LRNZ No data
QTUM Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
LRNZ No data
QTUM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

LRNZ1 paymentAll LRNZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2021 $0.06. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
QTUMQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll QTUM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2018 $0.04; Mar 12, 2019 $0.02; Jun 24, 2019 $0.08; Sep 17, 2019 $0.04; Dec 26, 2019 $0.04; Mar 24, 2020 $0.03; Jun 23, 2020 $0.07; Sep 22, 2020 $0.06; Dec 29, 2020 $0.05; Mar 24, 2021 $0.03; Jun 23, 2021 $0.10; Sep 22, 2021 $0.08; Dec 29, 2021 $0.07; Mar 23, 2022 $0.08; Jun 22, 2022 $0.19; Sep 21, 2022 $0.23; Dec 28, 2022 $0.07; Mar 22, 2023 $0.08; Jun 21, 2023 $0.12; Sep 20, 2023 $0.15; Dec 27, 2023 $0.09; Mar 20, 2024 $0.10; Jun 26, 2024 $0.20; Sep 25, 2024 $0.12; Dec 27, 2024 $0.08; Mar 26, 2025 $0.16; Jun 25, 2025 $0.27; Sep 24, 2025 $0.24; Dec 29, 2025 $0.45; Mar 25, 2026 $0.22; Jun 24, 2026 $0.27; Sep 23, 2026 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

LRNZ vs QTUM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • LRNZ
  • QTUM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: LRNZ −61.3% · Jan 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
LRNZ 34.5%QTUM 28.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
LRNZ 0.80QTUM 1.30, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
LRNZ −61.3%QTUM −38.4%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
LRNZ 1.79QTUM 1.67

LRNZ and QTUM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • LRNZCvsXAIXA

    TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsXAIXA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRNZCvsARTYA

    TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsARTYA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LRNZCvsAIHYB

    TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.68% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsAIHYB

    Defiance Quantum ETF · Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.