QTUM ranks 1st and LRNZ 19th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
LRNZ vs QTUM
QTUM −0.28pt a year
0.68%0.40%
QTUM 126.7×the volume
2.86K362K
QTUM +17.6pt
+3.9%+21.5%
LRNZ vs QTUM Performance
+20.9%+164.9%
- LRNZ 0.68%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- LRNZ $44M
- QTUM $5.06B
- LRNZ +17.8%, better
- QTUM +17.5%
- LRNZ 0.00%
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- LRNZ 26
- QTUM 89
- LRNZ 2.86K sh
- QTUM 362K sh, better
- LRNZ $65.16
- QTUM $134.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | LRNZ | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C41 | A86Higher |
| Mission | B65 | A74Higher |
| Risk | D36 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C40 | A91Higher |
| Durability | B58 | A79Higher |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. LRNZ and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
LRNZC
QTUMA
In short
LRNZ The stock-picker's AI fund. TrueShares launched LRNZ in 2020 and runs a couple dozen high-conviction technology and deep-learning names instead of a broad index basket. Concentrated by design, active by mandate.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
LRNZ The Fund is an actively managed ETF investing at least 80% of its net assets in common stock of technology, artificial intelligence, and deep learning companies. Its selection process emphasizes companies with substantial technology-related revenue, profit, or research-and-development exposure and competitive advantages in these fields.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
LRNZ vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
LRNZ vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying LRNZ vs QTUM
$5,162
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
LRNZ 0.68%
$13,252
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | LRNZ | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,215 | $723 | $492 |
| 20 | $4,633 | $2,793 | $1,840 |
| 30 | $13,252 | $8,090 | $5,162 |
- 0.68%LRNZ
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
LRNZ 17th cheapest of 30 funds
LRNZ vs QTUM Dividends
- LRNZ 0.00%
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- LRNZ None
- QTUM $1.40
- LRNZ
- QTUM $0.46
- LRNZ
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- LRNZ
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- LRNZ
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
LRNZ vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- LRNZ
- QTUM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- LRNZ 34.5%QTUM 28.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- LRNZ 0.80QTUM 1.30, better
- Worst fall
- LRNZ −61.3%QTUM −38.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- LRNZ 1.79QTUM 1.67
LRNZ and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.68% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.68% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


