CHPS ranks 4th and ASMH 7th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.
ASMH vs CHPS
4.8%by weight
CHPS −0.04pt a year
0.19%0.15%
CHPS 2.1×the volume
16.8K34.5K
ASMH vs CHPS Performance
+54.8%+61.5%
- ASMH 0.19%
- CHPS 0.15%, better
- ASMH $5M
- CHPS $130M
- ASMH +54.8%
- CHPS +61.5%, better
- ASMH
- CHPS 0.41%
- ASMH 2
- CHPS 54
- ASMH 16.8K sh
- CHPS 34.5K sh, better
- ASMH $11.82
- CHPS $75.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASMH | CHPS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | D37 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | F7 | A88Higher |
| Durability | D33 | A70Higher |
Rank among Semiconductors funds
Same Category. ASMH and CHPS are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASMHB
CHPSA
In short
ASMH Buy ASML through a plain US ADR and you own the euro too. ASMH pairs the ADR with a currency hedge contract, aiming at ASML's home-market total return instead of a dollar-translated one, for 0.19% a year.
CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.
Stated mandate
ASMH The fund provides exposure to the individual international company ASML Holding through an ADRhedged ETF structure that combines the ADR with a currency contract intended to mitigate foreign-exchange risk.
CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASMH vs CHPS Holdings
How ASMH and CHPS differ
4.8%
Shared holdings make up 94.0% of ASMH and 4.8% of CHPS.
Level by level
- Holdings4.8%
- Country5.9%
Sector
No Sector split for ASMH.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ASMHMore in CHPS | ASMH | CHPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | ASMH +94.1 points | 100.0% | 5.9% |
| United States | CHPS +62.5 points | 0.0% | 62.5% |
| Taiwan | CHPS +11.6 points | 0.0% | 11.6% |
| Japan | CHPS +10.4 points | 0.0% | 10.4% |
| South Korea | CHPS +5.2 points | 0.0% | 5.2% |
| Germany | CHPS +1.6 points | 0.0% | 1.6% |
| China | CHPS +1.3 points | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| Singapore | CHPS +0.7 points | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Other countries (2) | CHPS +0.8 points | 0.0% | 0.8% |
Outside the US: ASMH 100% developed, 0% emerging. CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging.
Concentration
- ASMH100.0%
- CHPS47.4%
- ASMH1
- CHPS53
Asset class
- ASMH
- Equity
- CHPS
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ASMH0
- In both1
- Only in CHPS52
Only in ASMH
0 securities, 0.0% of ASMH by weight
Only in CHPS
52 securities, 95.1% of CHPS by weight
- NVIDIA Corp5.34%
- Texas Instruments Inc5.31%
- Advanced Micro Dev5.20%
- Micron Technology4.97%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing4.95%
- Broadcom4.46%
- Analog Devices Inc4.44%
- SK Hynix Inc4.09%
- MediaTek Inc3.86%
- Lam Research Corp3.82%
- Kla-Tencor Corp3.81%
- QUALCOMM Inc3.80%
- Marvell Technology Group Ltd3.76%
- Applied Materials Inc3.64%
- Advantest Corp3.50%
- Intel Corp3.18%
- Tokyo Electron Ltd2.98%
- Kioxia Holdings Corp2.16%
- ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd1.69%
- Infineon Technologies AG1.61%
- NXP Semiconductors NV1.44%
- Te Connectivity Ltd1.37%
- Monolithic Power Systems Inc1.26%
- Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co Ltd1.08%
- Teradyne Inc0.94%
- Microchip Technology Inc0.90%
- Coherent Corp0.90%
- United Microelectronics Corp0.87%
- ASM International NV0.83%
- Astera Labs Inc0.76%
- STMicroelectronics NV0.67%
- Renesas Electronics Corp0.65%
- ON Semiconductor Corp0.61%
- Disco Corp0.60%
- Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.55%
- Entegris Inc0.52%
- Arm Holdings PLC Ads0.45%
- Nanya Technology Corp0.44%
- Tower Semiconductor Ltd0.43%
- VAT Group AG0.41%
- Lasertec Corp0.41%
- First Solar Inc0.40%
- MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings0.33%
- MKS Instruments Inc0.28%
- Lattice Semiconductor Corp0.28%
- BE Semiconductor Indstries NV0.27%
- MPI Corporation0.26%
- Fabrinet0.25%
- Screen Holdings Co0.24%
- Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.08%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in ASMHMore in CHPS | ASMH | CHPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding NV | ASMH +89.17 points | 93.98% | 4.81% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASMH vs CHPS Cost
Overpaying ASMH vs CHPS
$815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASMH 0.19%
$3,952
CHPS 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASMH | CHPS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $274 | $73 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $1,071 | $280 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $3,137 | $815 |
- 0.19%ASMH
- 0.15%CHPS, cheaper
- Middle half of Semiconductors funds
- Median 0.60%
CHPS cheapest of 25 funds
ASMH 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
ASMH vs CHPS Dividends
- ASMH
- CHPS 0.41%
- ASMH
- CHPS $0.31
- ASMH $0.08
- CHPS $0.10
- ASMH Jun 16, 2026
- CHPS Sep 18, 2026
- ASMH Jun 23, 2026
- CHPS Sep 25, 2026
- ASMH Quarterly
- CHPS Quarterly
Distribution history
ASMH vs CHPS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASMH 46.6%CHPS 41.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASMH 1.31CHPS 1.12
- Worst fall
- ASMH −21.7%CHPS −39.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ASMH 1.03CHPS 2.16
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.