Skip to content

ASMH vs CHPS

ASML Holding NV ADRhedged

ASMHBNYSE Arca

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

CHPSANasdaq

Overlap

4.8%by weight

Expense ratio

CHPS −0.04pt a year

ASMH0.19%CHPS0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

CHPS 2.1×the volume

ASMH16.8KCHPS34.5K

ASMH vs CHPS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+54.8%ASMH+61.5%CHPS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ASMH +54.8%. CHPS +61.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%25%100%125%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ASMH 0.19%
CHPS 0.15%, better
Fund size
ASMH $5M
CHPS $130M
1Y total return
ASMH +54.8%
CHPS +61.5%, better
Yield (12M)
ASMH No data
CHPS 0.41%
Holdings
ASMH 2
CHPS 54
Avg volume (30D)
ASMH 16.8K sh
CHPS 34.5K sh, better
NAV per share
ASMH $11.82
CHPS $75.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ASMH: Cost 92, Risk 86, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings 7, Durability 33. CHPS: Cost 100, Risk 56, Mission 70, Tradability 49, Holdings 88, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for ASMH, CHPS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarASMHCHPS
Cost30% weightA92A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA70
Risk15% weightA86HigherB56
Tradability15% weightD37C49Higher
Holdings10% weightF7A88Higher
Durability5% weightD33A70Higher

Rank among Semiconductors funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ASMH and CHPS are both graded against the same 25 Semiconductors funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Semiconductors⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

CHPS ranks 4th and ASMH 7th of 25 funds in the Semiconductors Category.

  1. Rank 1ASOXQInvesco PHLX Semiconductor ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2ASMHVanEck Semiconductor ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3ASOXXiShares Semiconductor ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 4ACHPSXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETFScore 77
  5. Rank 5AXSDState Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 6BSMHXVanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETFScore 68
  7. Rank 7BASMHASML Holding NV ADRhedgedScore 64
  8. Rank 7BCHPXGlobal X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ASMHBASML Holding NV ADRhedged

CHPSAXtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF

In short

ASMH Buy ASML through a plain US ADR and you own the euro too. ASMH pairs the ADR with a currency hedge contract, aiming at ASML's home-market total return instead of a dollar-translated one, for 0.19% a year.

CHPS Semiconductors without the semiconductor markup. CHPS tracks a global chip index with an ESG screen baked in, holds roughly 50 names, and charges 0.15%, undercutting the category's household names.

Stated mandate

ASMH The fund provides exposure to the individual international company ASML Holding through an ADRhedged ETF structure that combines the ADR with a currency contract intended to mitigate foreign-exchange risk.

CHPS The fund seeks investment results corresponding generally to the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • ASMH Holds the ASML ADR alongside a euro hedge contract that is marked to market daily, so the target is the stock's local-market total return, not the ADR's currency-translated version.adrhedged.com
  • 0.19% a year, below the 0.35% median for the semiconductor funds we track, with the currency hedge built into the wrapper rather than something you assemble yourself.
  • It is a US-listed ETF, so the hedged exposure lands in an ordinary brokerage account. No foreign listing, no separate FX trade to place or roll.precidian.com
  • Part of a whole ADRhedged lineup (Taiwan Semiconductor, Arm, STMicroelectronics, Sony and more), so the same hedged structure extends name by name across international blue chips.sec.gov
  • CHPS At 0.15%, one of the cheapest doors into chips. SMH and SOXX each charge more than double.
  • Global mandate, so foreign foundries and equipment makers are in scope, not just the US-listed marquee names.
  • The ESG screen sits inside the index itself: the chip universe gets filtered before the portfolio is built.
  • Simple plumbing. Roughly 50 holdings, one published index, cash paid out quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • ASMH This is one company, not a chip basket. Cohort peers like SOXX and SMH spread across dozens of names; here everything rides on ASML.
  • A hedge cuts both ways: a falling dollar no longer flatters your return the way it can with an unhedged ADR, and hedging carries its own costs and tracking slippage.adrhedged.com
  • Launched in 2025, still small and lightly traded, which tends to mean wider spreads than the big semiconductor funds and a short record to judge.
  • CHPS Trades thinly next to SMH and SOXX. Spreads can be wider, and size takes more care to get filled.
  • Launched in 2023, so the record is short against chip funds that have lived through several boom-bust cycles.
  • The screen excludes some chip companies outright, so the lineup can look different from unscreened rivals.

Full ASMH profile⁠

Full CHPS profile⁠

ASMH vs CHPS Holdings

How ASMH and CHPS differ

Overlap by weight

4.8%

Shared holdings make up 94.0% of ASMH and 4.8% of CHPS.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both4.8%
  • Countryby domicile5.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for ASMH.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ASMH and CHPS, widest gap first
CountryMore in ASMHMore in CHPS
NetherlandsASMH +94.1 points
United StatesCHPS +62.5 points
TaiwanCHPS +11.6 points
JapanCHPS +10.4 points
South KoreaCHPS +5.2 points
GermanyCHPS +1.6 points
ChinaCHPS +1.3 points
SingaporeCHPS +0.7 points
Other countries (2)CHPS +0.8 points

Outside the US: ASMH 100% developed, 0% emerging. CHPS 50% developed, 50% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ASMH100.0%
  • CHPS47.4%

Securities held

  • ASMH1
  • CHPS53

Asset class

ASMH
Equity
CHPS
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ASMH0
  • In both1
  • Only in CHPS52

Only in ASMH

0 securities, 0.0% of ASMH by weight

Only in CHPS

52 securities, 95.1% of CHPS by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp5.34%
  • Texas Instruments Inc5.31%
  • Advanced Micro Dev5.20%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ASMH and CHPS, widest gap first
HoldingMore in ASMHMore in CHPS
ASML Holding NVASMH +89.17 points

All ASMH holdings⁠All 54 CHPS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ASMH vs CHPS Cost

Overpaying ASMH vs CHPS

$815

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ASMH 0.19%

    $3,952

  • CHPS 0.15%

    $3,137

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ASMH 0.19%
  • CHPS 0.15%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530ASMH $3,952CHPS $3,137

Year by year

YearASMHCHPSOverpaying
10$347$274$73
20$1,351$1,071$280
30$3,952$3,137$815

Expense ratio

  • 0.19%ASMH
  • 0.15%CHPS, cheaper
  • Middle half of Semiconductors funds
  • Median 0.60%

CHPS cheapest of 25 funds

ASMH 2nd cheapest of 25 funds

ASMH vs CHPS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ASMH No data
CHPS 0.41%
Payout (12M)
ASMH No data
CHPS $0.31
Last payment
ASMH $0.08
CHPS $0.10
Ex-dividend
ASMH Jun 16, 2026
CHPS Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
ASMH Jun 23, 2026
CHPS Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
ASMH Quarterly
CHPS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

ASMHQuarterly · 3 paymentsAll ASMH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2025 $0.01; Mar 16, 2026 $0.10; Jun 16, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
CHPSQuarterly · 14 paymentsAll CHPS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Sep 15, 2023 $0.02; Dec 15, 2023 $0.08; Mar 15, 2024 $0.05; Jun 21, 2024 $0.07; Sep 20, 2024 $0.10; Dec 6, 2024 $0.22; Dec 20, 2024 $0.08; Mar 21, 2025 $0.06; Jun 20, 2025 $0.08; Sep 19, 2025 $0.10; Dec 19, 2025 $0.08; Mar 20, 2026 $0.05; Jun 18, 2026 $0.07; Sep 18, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

ASMH vs CHPS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ASMH 46.6%since Apr 2025CHPS 41.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ASMH 1.31since Apr 2025CHPS 1.12
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ASMH −21.7%since Mar 2025CHPS −39.4%since Jul 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ASMH 1.03CHPS 2.16

Popular comparisons

  • ASMHBvsSOXQA

    ASML Holding NV ADRhedged · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CHPSAvsSOXQA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASMHBvsSMHA

    ASML Holding NV ADRhedged · VanEck Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CHPSAvsSMHA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · VanEck Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASMHBvsSOXXA

    ASML Holding NV ADRhedged · iShares Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.19% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CHPSAvsSOXXA

    Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF · iShares Semiconductor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.