AUGP ranks 2nd and DECZ 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGP vs DECZ
0.0%by weight
AUGP −0.29pt a year
0.50%0.79%
AUGP 4.7×the volume
7.35K1.55K
AUGP vs DECZ Performance
+10.3%+7.9%
- AUGP 0.50%, better
- DECZ 0.79%
- AUGP $38M
- DECZ $37M
- AUGP +10.3%, better
- DECZ +7.9%
- AUGP
- DECZ 3.04%
- AUGP 4
- DECZ 17
- AUGP 7.35K sh, better
- DECZ 1.55K sh
- AUGP $34.23
- DECZ $44.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGP | DECZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | F24 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | D38 | C43Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGP and DECZ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGPB
DECZC
In short
DECZ Most buffer ETFs trade your upside for the cushion. DECZ skips the hard cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price-index losses each 12-month period, at 0.79% with no waiver.
Stated mandate
DECZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while cushioning the first 8% to 12% of index losses during each twelve-month period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGP vs DECZ Holdings
How AUGP and DECZ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AUGP and 0.0% of DECZ.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AUGP.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AUGPMore in DECZ | AUGP | DECZ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | DECZ +0.5 points | 99.5% | 100.0% |
| Switzerland | AUGP +0.3 points | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| China | AUGP +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Mexico | AUGP +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- AUGP103.3%
- DECZ99.8%
- AUGP3
- DECZ3
Asset class
- AUGP
- Alternatives
- DECZ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AUGP3
- In both0
- Only in DECZ3
Only in AUGP
3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.85%
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.033.59%
- Net Current Assets<0.01%
Only in DECZ
3 securities, 91.1% of DECZ by weight
- Treasury Bill B 11/27/2690.97%
- State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.08%
- Broker Sweep0.04%
Weight gaps
AUGP and DECZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGP vs DECZ Cost
Overpaying DECZ vs AUGP
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGP 0.50%
$9,979
DECZ 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGP | DECZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,405 | $505 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,331 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $15,174 | $5,195 |
- 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
- 0.79%DECZ
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds
DECZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGP vs DECZ Dividends
- AUGP
- DECZ 3.04%
- AUGP None
- DECZ $1.32
- AUGP
- DECZ $1.32
- AUGP
- DECZ Dec 24, 2025
- AUGP
- DECZ Dec 26, 2025
- AUGP
- DECZ Annual
Distribution history
AUGP vs DECZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGP 6.2%DECZ 9.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGP 1.31DECZ 1.25
- Worst fall
- AUGP −11.1%DECZ −16.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGP 0.53DECZ 0.71
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.