Skip to content

DECZ vs SIXJ

TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF

DECZCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

DECZ0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXJ 9.8×the volume

DECZ1.55KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

DECZ +1.6pt

DECZ+16.5%SIXJ+14.9%

DECZ vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.9%DECZ+10.5%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DECZ +7.9%. SIXJ +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DECZ 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
DECZ $37M
SIXJ $149M
1Y total return
DECZ +7.9%
SIXJ +10.5%, better
Yield (12M)
DECZ 3.04%
SIXJ No data
Holdings
DECZ 17
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
DECZ 1.55K sh
SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
NAV per share
DECZ $44.10
SIXJ $37.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DECZ: Cost 40, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings 100, Durability 43. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for DECZ, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDECZSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF24B67Higher
Tradability15% weightC46A70Higher
Holdings10% weightA100HigherC53
Durability5% weightC43B57Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DECZ and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and DECZ 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 42CFAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - AugustScore 47
  7. Rank 44CDECZTrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETFScore 46
  8. Rank 44CFAPRFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - AprilScore 46

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DECZCTrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

DECZ Most buffer ETFs trade your upside for the cushion. DECZ skips the hard cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price-index losses each 12-month period, at 0.79% with no waiver.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

DECZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while cushioning the first 8% to 12% of index losses during each twelve-month period.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • DECZ No stated ceiling on gains. TrueShares built this series around leaving the rally side open, with upside set by options pricing rather than a fixed cap.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • The buffer is spelled out in the fund's own documents: the first 8% to 12% of index losses per 12-month period, with the manager targeting 10%.true-shares.com
  • The payoff is built from exchange-listed FLEX options inside a 1940 Act fund, not a bank-issued note, so no third-party credit sits behind it.sec.gov
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • DECZ Uncapped is not full participation. Option costs come out of the upside, and the reference is the S&P 500 price index, so index dividends sit outside the return.true-shares.com
  • Fee is 0.79% with no waiver, near the category median. Cheaper buffer builds exist, including AUGP and PQX at 0.50%.
  • Small and thinly traded, and the buffer is measured from each period's start, so a mid-period buy gets a different cushion than a day-one holder.sec.gov
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full DECZ profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

DECZ vs SIXJ Holdings

How DECZ and SIXJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DECZ and 0.0% of SIXJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

Sector weights in DECZ and SIXJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in DECZMore in SIXJ
TechnologySIXJ +2.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryDECZ +0.9 points
IndustrialsDECZ +0.8 points
EnergySIXJ +0.4 points
FinancialsDECZ +0.4 points
UtilitiesDECZ +0.4 points
Health CareSIXJ +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesDECZ +0.2 points
Real EstateDECZ +0.2 points
MaterialsDECZ +0.1 points
CommunicationDECZ +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DECZ and SIXJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in DECZMore in SIXJ
United StatesDECZ +0.5 points
SwitzerlandSIXJ +0.3 points
ChinaSIXJ +0.1 points
MexicoSIXJ +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DECZ99.8%
  • SIXJ100.8%

Securities held

  • DECZ3
  • SIXJ2

Asset class

DECZ
Equity
SIXJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DECZ3
  • In both0
  • Only in SIXJ2

Only in DECZ

3 securities, 91.1% of DECZ by weight

  • Treasury Bill B 11/27/2690.97%
  • State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.08%
  • Broker Sweep0.04%

Only in SIXJ

2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C99.26%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P1.26%

Weight gaps

DECZ and SIXJ share no securities.

All 21 DECZ holdings⁠All 5 SIXJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DECZ vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying DECZ vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DECZ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DECZ 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DECZ $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearDECZSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%DECZ
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

DECZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

DECZ vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DECZ 3.04%
SIXJ No data
Payout (12M)
DECZ $1.32
SIXJ None
Last payment
DECZ $1.32
SIXJ No data
Ex-dividend
DECZ Dec 24, 2025
SIXJ No data
Paid on
DECZ Dec 26, 2025
SIXJ No data
Frequency
DECZ Annual
SIXJ No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

DECZAnnual · 5 paymentsAll DECZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2021 $0.14; Dec 29, 2022 $0.39; Dec 27, 2023 $0.39; Dec 27, 2024 $0.94; Dec 24, 2025 $1.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DECZ vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DECZ 9.1%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DECZ 1.25SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DECZ −16.6%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DECZ 0.71SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • DECZCvsZALTA

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECZCvsAUGPB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DECZCvsTENJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.