TENJ ranks 3rd and DECZ 44th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
DECZ vs TENJ
0.0%by weight
TENJ −0.26pt a year
0.79%0.53%
TENJ 15.9×the volume
1.55K24.6K
DECZ vs TENJ Performance
+7.9%+11.7%
- DECZ 0.79%
- TENJ 0.53%, better
- DECZ $37M
- TENJ $47M
- DECZ +7.9%
- TENJ +11.7%, better
- DECZ 3.04%
- TENJ
- DECZ 17
- TENJ 4
- DECZ 1.55K sh
- TENJ 24.6K sh, better
- DECZ $44.10
- TENJ $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DECZ | TENJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | C51 |
| Durability | C43Higher | C41 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. DECZ and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DECZC
TENJB
In short
DECZ Most buffer ETFs trade your upside for the cushion. DECZ skips the hard cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price-index losses each 12-month period, at 0.79% with no waiver.
Stated mandate
DECZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while cushioning the first 8% to 12% of index losses during each twelve-month period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DECZ vs TENJ Holdings
How DECZ and TENJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of DECZ and 0.0% of TENJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TENJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in DECZMore in TENJ | DECZ | TENJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | DECZ +0.4 points | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | TENJ +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| China | TENJ +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- DECZ99.8%
- TENJ102.6%
- DECZ3
- TENJ2
Asset class
- DECZ
- Equity
- TENJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in DECZ3
- In both0
- Only in TENJ2
Only in DECZ
3 securities, 91.1% of DECZ by weight
- Treasury Bill B 11/27/2690.97%
- State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.08%
- Broker Sweep0.04%
Only in TENJ
2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%
Weight gaps
DECZ and TENJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DECZ vs TENJ Cost
Overpaying DECZ vs TENJ
$4,638
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DECZ 0.79%
$15,174
TENJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DECZ | TENJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $953 | $452 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,658 | $1,673 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $10,536 | $4,638 |
- 0.79%DECZ
- 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds
DECZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
DECZ vs TENJ Dividends
- DECZ 3.04%
- TENJ
- DECZ $1.32
- TENJ
- DECZ $1.32
- TENJ $0.07
- DECZ Dec 24, 2025
- TENJ Dec 23, 2025
- DECZ Dec 26, 2025
- TENJ Dec 29, 2025
- DECZ Annual
- TENJ Irregular
Distribution history
DECZ vs TENJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DECZ 9.1%TENJ 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DECZ 1.25TENJ 0.90
- Worst fall
- DECZ −16.6%TENJ −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- DECZ 0.71TENJ 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.