AUGP ranks 2nd and JANT 12th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGP vs JANT
0.0%by weight
AUGP −0.24pt a year
0.50%0.74%
JANT 1.2×the volume
7.35K8.84K
AUGP vs JANT Performance
+10.3%+12.1%
- AUGP 0.50%, better
- JANT 0.74%
- AUGP $38M
- JANT $56M
- AUGP +10.3%
- JANT +12.1%, better
- AUGP 4
- JANT 2
- AUGP 7.35K sh
- JANT 8.84K sh, better
- AUGP $34.23
- JANT $45.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGP | JANT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | B68 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | F24 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | |
| Durability | D38 | B56Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGP and JANT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGPB
JANTB
In short
JANT A buffer fund that runs on the calendar: the 12-month outcome period opens January 1 and closes December 31, absorbing the first 10% of S&P 500 price losses in exchange for a cap reset each New Year.
Stated mandate
JANT The Fund seeks to match the stated underlying reference's returns at the end of the current Outcome Period up to an upside Cap, while providing a downside buffer against the first 10% of losses before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGP vs JANT Holdings
How AUGP and JANT differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AUGP and 0.0% of JANT.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AUGP.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AUGPMore in JANT | AUGP | JANT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- AUGP103.3%
- JANT101.5%
- AUGP3
- JANT2
Asset class
- AUGP
- Alternatives
- JANT
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AUGP3
- In both0
- Only in JANT2
Only in AUGP
3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.85%
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.033.59%
- Net Current Assets<0.01%
Only in JANT
2 securities, 100% of JANT by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 5.05 C101.12%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.85 P0.42%
Weight gaps
AUGP and JANT share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGP vs JANT Cost
Overpaying JANT vs AUGP
$4,328
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGP 0.50%
$9,979
JANT 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGP | JANT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,319 | $419 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,015 | $1,555 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,307 | $4,328 |
- 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
- 0.74%JANT
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds
JANT 17th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGP vs JANT Dividends
- AUGP None
- JANT None
Distribution history
AUGP vs JANT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGP 6.2%JANT 8.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGP 1.31JANT 1.55
- Worst fall
- AUGP −11.1%JANT −16.2%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGP 0.53JANT 0.68
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.