TENJ ranks 3rd and JANT 12th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
JANT vs TENJ
0.0%by weight
TENJ −0.21pt a year
0.74%0.53%
TENJ 2.8×the volume
8.84K24.6K
JANT vs TENJ Performance
+12.1%+11.7%
- JANT 0.74%
- TENJ 0.53%, better
- JANT $56M
- TENJ $47M
- JANT +12.1%, better
- TENJ +11.7%
- JANT 2
- TENJ 4
- JANT 8.84K sh
- TENJ 24.6K sh, better
- JANT $45.64
- TENJ $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JANT | TENJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | C46 | C51Higher |
| Durability | B56Higher | C41 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. JANT and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JANTB
TENJB
In short
JANT A buffer fund that runs on the calendar: the 12-month outcome period opens January 1 and closes December 31, absorbing the first 10% of S&P 500 price losses in exchange for a cap reset each New Year.
Stated mandate
JANT The Fund seeks to match the stated underlying reference's returns at the end of the current Outcome Period up to an upside Cap, while providing a downside buffer against the first 10% of losses before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JANT vs TENJ Holdings
How JANT and TENJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JANT and 0.0% of TENJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TENJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JANTMore in TENJ | JANT | TENJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | TENJ +0.1 points | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | JANT +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- JANT101.5%
- TENJ102.6%
- JANT2
- TENJ2
Asset class
- JANT
- Equity
- TENJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in JANT2
- In both0
- Only in TENJ2
Only in JANT
2 securities, 100% of JANT by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 5.05 C101.12%
- Spy 12/31/2026 681.85 P0.42%
Only in TENJ
2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%
Weight gaps
JANT and TENJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JANT vs TENJ Cost
Overpaying JANT vs TENJ
$3,771
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JANT 0.74%
$14,307
TENJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JANT | TENJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $953 | $366 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,658 | $1,357 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $10,536 | $3,771 |
- 0.74%JANT
- 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds
JANT 17th cheapest of 77 funds
JANT vs TENJ Dividends
- JANT None
- TENJ
- JANT
- TENJ $0.07
- JANT
- TENJ Dec 23, 2025
- JANT
- TENJ Dec 29, 2025
- JANT
- TENJ Irregular
Distribution history
JANT vs TENJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JANT 8.1%TENJ 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JANT 1.55TENJ 0.90
- Worst fall
- JANT −16.2%TENJ −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- JANT 0.68TENJ 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.