Skip to content
etf.net

AUGP vs JULZ

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

AUGPBCboe

Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF

JULZDCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

AUGP −0.29pt a year

AUGP0.50%JULZ0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGP 1.7×the volume

AUGP7.35KJULZ4.27K

AUGP vs JULZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+9.9%AUGP+7.6%JULZ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. AUGP +9.9%. JULZ +7.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AUGP 0.50%, better
JULZ 0.79%
Fund size
AUGP $38M
JULZ $38M
1Y total return
AUGP +9.9%, better
JULZ +7.6%
Yield (12M)
AUGP No data
JULZ 11.07%
Holdings
AUGP 4
JULZ 9
Avg volume (30D)
AUGP 7.35K sh, better
JULZ 4.27K sh
NAV per share
AUGP $33.89
JULZ $45.66
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGP: Cost 91, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. JULZ: Cost 40, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGP, JULZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGPJULZ
Cost30% weightA91HigherC40
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherF24
Tradability15% weightF24C48Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD38C52Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGP and JULZ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

AUGP ranks 2nd and JULZ 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39
  6. Rank 65DFHDGFT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 38

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGPBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

JULZDTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF

In short

AUGP No data

JULZ The buffer ETF that skips the ceiling. JULZ buffers the first 8% to 12% of a 12-month drop in the S&P 500 price index with no cap on the upside, the format TrueShares pioneered in 2020.

Stated mandate

AUGP No data

JULZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while seeking to buffer the first 8%–12% of index losses over each 12-month period.

Why people hold it

AUGP No data

  • JULZ Most buffer funds pay for downside cushion with an upside cap. This one doesn't: the buffer targets the first 8% to 12% of index losses each 12-month period, no ceiling attached.true-shares.com
  • Running since 2020, from the shop that launched the uncapped buffer format. Sibling funds cover other start months (AUGZ, SEPZ, MARZ), so entry dates can be staggered across the year.true-shares.com
  • Fee of 0.79% sits right at the going rate for shallow-buffer S&P 500 funds, and the outcome period resets on a fixed annual calendar each July 1.

Worth knowing

AUGP No data

  • JULZ Uncapped is not the same as full upside. Participation in index gains can land under 100%, and the reference is the S&P 500 price index, so dividends sit outside the math.true-shares.com
  • The buffer is a targeted range (8% to 12%, aimed at 10%) measured over the full 12-month period, not a guarantee. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and exposure differ.true-shares.com
  • Small fund, thin trading, so spreads can run wider than the biggest buffer names. Laddered buffer peers such as BUFB charge materially less.

Full AUGP profile⁠

Full JULZ profile⁠

AUGP vs JULZ Holdings

How AUGP and JULZ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AUGP and 0.0% of JULZ.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile99.5%

Sector

No Sector split for AUGP.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AUGP and JULZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in AUGPMore in JULZ
United StatesJULZ +0.5 points
SwitzerlandAUGP +0.3 points
ChinaAUGP +0.1 points
MexicoAUGP +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AUGP103.3%
  • JULZ102.3%

Securities held

  • AUGP3
  • JULZ3

Asset class

AUGP
Alternatives
JULZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AUGP3
  • In both0
  • Only in JULZ3

Only in AUGP

3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight

  • 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.09%
  • 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.034.30%
  • Net Current Assets<0.01%

Only in JULZ

3 securities, 96.0% of JULZ by weight

  • Treasury Bill B 06/10/2795.84%
  • State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.08%
  • Broker Sweep0.03%

Weight gaps

AUGP and JULZ share no securities.

All AUGP holdings⁠All 10 JULZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGP vs JULZ Cost

Overpaying JULZ vs AUGP

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • JULZ 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGP 0.50%
  • JULZ 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530JULZ $15,174AUGP $9,979

Year by year

YearAUGPJULZOverpaying
10$900$1,405$505
20$3,460$5,331$1,871
30$9,979$15,174$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
  • 0.79%JULZ
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

JULZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP vs JULZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUGP No data
JULZ 11.07%
Payout (12M)
AUGP None
JULZ $5.04
Last payment
AUGP No data
JULZ $5.04
Ex-dividend
AUGP No data
JULZ Dec 24, 2025
Paid on
AUGP No data
JULZ Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
AUGP No data
JULZ Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

AUGPAll AUGP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULZAnnual · 4 paymentsAll JULZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2022 $0.02; Dec 27, 2023 $1.30; Dec 27, 2024 $1.37; Dec 24, 2025 $5.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

AUGP vs JULZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGP 6.2%since Jun 2024JULZ 10.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGP 1.31since Jun 2024JULZ 1.15
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGP −11.1%since May 2024JULZ −14.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGP 0.53JULZ 0.80

Popular comparisons

  • AUGPBvsZALTA

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULZDvsZALTA

    Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsTENJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULZDvsTENJB

    Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsSIXJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULZDvsSIXJB

    Trueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.