TENJ ranks 3rd and JULZ 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
JULZ vs TENJ
0.0%by weight
TENJ −0.26pt a year
0.79%0.53%
TENJ 5.8×the volume
4.27K24.6K
JULZ vs TENJ Performance
+7.6%+11.3%
- JULZ 0.79%
- TENJ 0.53%, better
- JULZ $38M
- TENJ $47M
- JULZ +7.6%
- TENJ +11.3%, better
- JULZ 11.07%
- TENJ
- JULZ 9
- TENJ 4
- JULZ 4.27K sh
- TENJ 24.6K sh, better
- JULZ $45.66
- TENJ $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULZ | TENJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | |
| Durability | C52Higher | C41 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. JULZ and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULZD
TENJB
In short
JULZ The buffer ETF that skips the ceiling. JULZ buffers the first 8% to 12% of a 12-month drop in the S&P 500 price index with no cap on the upside, the format TrueShares pioneered in 2020.
Stated mandate
JULZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while seeking to buffer the first 8%–12% of index losses over each 12-month period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULZ vs TENJ Holdings
How JULZ and TENJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULZ and 0.0% of TENJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TENJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JULZMore in TENJ | JULZ | TENJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | JULZ +0.4 points | 100.0% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | TENJ +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| China | TENJ +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- JULZ102.3%
- TENJ102.6%
- JULZ3
- TENJ2
Asset class
- JULZ
- Equity
- TENJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in JULZ3
- In both0
- Only in TENJ2
Only in JULZ
3 securities, 96.0% of JULZ by weight
- Treasury Bill B 06/10/2795.84%
- State Street Inst U.s. Government Mmkt Admn Class0.08%
- Broker Sweep0.03%
Only in TENJ
2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%
Weight gaps
JULZ and TENJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULZ vs TENJ Cost
Overpaying JULZ vs TENJ
$4,638
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULZ 0.79%
$15,174
TENJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULZ | TENJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $953 | $452 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,658 | $1,673 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $10,536 | $4,638 |
- 0.79%JULZ
- 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ vs TENJ Dividends
- JULZ 11.07%
- TENJ
- JULZ $5.04
- TENJ
- JULZ $5.04
- TENJ $0.07
- JULZ Dec 24, 2025
- TENJ Dec 23, 2025
- JULZ Dec 26, 2025
- TENJ Dec 29, 2025
- JULZ Annual
- TENJ Irregular
Distribution history
JULZ vs TENJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULZ 10.1%TENJ 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULZ 1.15TENJ 0.90
- Worst fall
- JULZ −14.7%TENJ −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- JULZ 0.80TENJ 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.