SIXJ ranks 4th and JULZ 64th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
JULZ vs SIXJ
SIXJ −0.05pt a year
0.79%0.74%
SIXJ 3.5×the volume
4.27K15.1K
JULZ +1.4pt
+16.0%+14.6%
JULZ vs SIXJ Performance
+7.6%+10.2%
- JULZ 0.79%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- JULZ $38M
- SIXJ $148M
- JULZ +7.6%
- SIXJ +10.2%, better
- JULZ 11.07%
- SIXJ
- JULZ 9
- SIXJ 3
- JULZ 4.27K sh
- SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
- JULZ $45.66
- SIXJ $37.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULZ | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | B68Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | C52 | B57Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. JULZ and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JULZD
SIXJB
In short
JULZ The buffer ETF that skips the ceiling. JULZ buffers the first 8% to 12% of a 12-month drop in the S&P 500 price index with no cap on the upside, the format TrueShares pioneered in 2020.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
JULZ The Fund seeks to track the S&P 500 Price Return Index before fees and expenses while seeking to buffer the first 8%–12% of index losses over each 12-month period.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JULZ vs SIXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULZ vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying JULZ vs SIXJ
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULZ 0.79%
$15,174
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULZ | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,319 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,015 | $316 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $14,307 | $867 |
- 0.79%JULZ
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
JULZ vs SIXJ Dividends
- JULZ 11.07%
- SIXJ
- JULZ $5.04
- SIXJ None
- JULZ $5.04
- SIXJ
- JULZ Dec 24, 2025
- SIXJ
- JULZ Dec 26, 2025
- SIXJ
- JULZ Annual
- SIXJ
Distribution history
JULZ vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULZ 10.1%SIXJ 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JULZ 1.15SIXJ 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- JULZ −14.7%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- JULZ 0.80SIXJ 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.