Skip to content
etf.net

AUGP vs MART

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

AUGPBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF

MARTCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

AUGP −0.24pt a year

AUGP0.50%MART0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGP 7.7×the volume

AUGP7.35KMART956

AUGP vs MART Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.3%AUGP+12.8%MART

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGP +10.3%. MART +12.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGP 0.50%, better
MART 0.74%
Fund size
AUGP $38M
MART $29M
1Y total return
AUGP +10.3%
MART +12.8%, better
Holdings
AUGP 4
MART 2
Avg volume (30D)
AUGP 7.35K sh, better
MART 956 sh
NAV per share
AUGP $34.23
MART $43.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGP: Cost 91, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. MART: Cost 68, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 45, Durability 27.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGP, MART, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGPMART
Cost30% weightA91HigherB68
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherA71
Tradability15% weightF24D31Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC45
Durability5% weightD38HigherD27

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGP and MART are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

AUGP ranks 2nd and MART 27th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 27CBJANInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 27CMARTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 27CSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGPBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

MARTCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF

In short

AUGP No data

MART A March-reset buffer fund: it absorbs the first 10% of a year's drop in an S&P 500 ETF and caps the upside for that stretch in exchange. Standard recipe for the category, priced a shade under the typical rival.

Stated mandate

AUGP No data

MART The Fund seeks to provide downside-loss protection covering the first 10% of losses on its Underlying ETF, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

AUGP No data

  • MART The contract is legible: over each one-year period starting in March, the first 10% of the S&P 500 ETF's losses are absorbed before fees and expenses, with upside capped at a level set that March.
  • A 0.74% fee undercuts the typical S&P 500 buffer fund, which matters in a wrapper where the cushion is measured before fees and expenses.
  • No exotic reference: the fund tracks outcomes against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and the combination of plain benchmark and low fee puts it in the upper half of a crowded buffer cohort.

Worth knowing

AUGP No data

  • MART Small asset base, light volume. Spreads can widen, so limit orders and a glance at intraday value matter more here than with a mega-cap index fund.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the headline 10%. The design lines up cleanly only from one March reset to the next.
  • Income isn't part of the package; returns show up in price. Cheaper buffer builds exist in the same cohort, like PSFF at 0.10% and BUFP at 0.50%.

Full AUGP profile⁠

Full MART profile⁠

AUGP vs MART Holdings

How AUGP and MART differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AUGP and 0.0% of MART.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for AUGP.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AUGP and MART, widest gap first
CountryMore in AUGPMore in MART
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AUGP103.3%
  • MART102.8%

Securities held

  • AUGP3
  • MART2

Asset class

AUGP
Alternatives
MART
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AUGP3
  • In both0
  • Only in MART2

Only in AUGP

3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight

  • 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.85%
  • 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.033.59%
  • Net Current Assets<0.01%

Only in MART

2 securities, 100% of MART by weight

  • Spy 02/26/2027 5.08 C101.83%
  • Spy 02/26/2027 685.92 P0.96%

Weight gaps

AUGP and MART share no securities.

All AUGP holdings⁠All 5 MART holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGP vs MART Cost

Overpaying MART vs AUGP

$4,328

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • MART 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGP 0.50%
  • MART 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MART $14,307AUGP $9,979

Year by year

YearAUGPMARTOverpaying
10$900$1,319$419
20$3,460$5,015$1,555
30$9,979$14,307$4,328

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
  • 0.74%MART
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

MART 17th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP vs MART Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGP None
MART None

Distribution history

AUGPAll AUGP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

MARTAll MART payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGP vs MART Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGP 6.2%since Jun 2024MART 7.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGP 1.31since Jun 2024MART 1.61
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGP −11.1%since May 2024MART −11.6%since Mar 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGP 0.53MART 0.60

Popular comparisons

  • AUGPBvsZALTA

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MARTCvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsTENJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MARTCvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsSIXJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • MARTCvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.