TENJ ranks 3rd and MART 27th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
MART vs TENJ
0.0%by weight
TENJ −0.21pt a year
0.74%0.53%
TENJ 25.7×the volume
95624.6K
MART vs TENJ Performance
+12.8%+11.7%
- MART 0.74%
- TENJ 0.53%, better
- MART $29M
- TENJ $47M
- MART +12.8%, better
- TENJ +11.7%
- MART 2
- TENJ 4
- MART 956 sh
- TENJ 24.6K sh, better
- MART $43.37
- TENJ $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MART | TENJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A71Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D31 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | C51Higher |
| Durability | D27 | C41Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. MART and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MARTC
TENJB
In short
MART A March-reset buffer fund: it absorbs the first 10% of a year's drop in an S&P 500 ETF and caps the upside for that stretch in exchange. Standard recipe for the category, priced a shade under the typical rival.
Stated mandate
MART The Fund seeks to provide downside-loss protection covering the first 10% of losses on its Underlying ETF, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MART vs TENJ Holdings
How MART and TENJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MART and 0.0% of TENJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TENJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in MARTMore in TENJ | MART | TENJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | TENJ +0.1 points | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | MART +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- MART102.8%
- TENJ102.6%
- MART2
- TENJ2
Asset class
- MART
- Equity
- TENJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in MART2
- In both0
- Only in TENJ2
Only in MART
2 securities, 100% of MART by weight
- Spy 02/26/2027 5.08 C101.83%
- Spy 02/26/2027 685.92 P0.96%
Only in TENJ
2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%
Weight gaps
MART and TENJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MART vs TENJ Cost
Overpaying MART vs TENJ
$3,771
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MART 0.74%
$14,307
TENJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MART | TENJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $953 | $366 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $3,658 | $1,357 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $10,536 | $3,771 |
- 0.74%MART
- 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds
MART 17th cheapest of 77 funds
MART vs TENJ Dividends
- MART None
- TENJ
- MART
- TENJ $0.07
- MART
- TENJ Dec 23, 2025
- MART
- TENJ Dec 29, 2025
- MART
- TENJ Irregular
Distribution history
MART vs TENJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MART 7.5%TENJ 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- MART 1.61TENJ 0.90
- Worst fall
- MART −11.6%TENJ −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- MART 0.60TENJ 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.