Skip to content

MART vs TENJ

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF

MARTCCboe

iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

TENJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

TENJ −0.21pt a year

MART0.74%TENJ0.53%

Avg volume · 30D

TENJ 25.7×the volume

MART956TENJ24.6K

MART vs TENJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+12.8%MART+11.7%TENJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. MART +12.8%. TENJ +11.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
MART 0.74%
TENJ 0.53%, better
Fund size
MART $29M
TENJ $47M
1Y total return
MART +12.8%, better
TENJ +11.7%
Holdings
MART 2
TENJ 4
Avg volume (30D)
MART 956 sh
TENJ 24.6K sh, better
NAV per share
MART $43.37
TENJ $28.09
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MART: Cost 68, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 31, Holdings 45, Durability 27. TENJ: Cost 86, Risk 49, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings 51, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for MART, TENJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMARTTENJ
Cost30% weightB68A86Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA71HigherC49
Tradability15% weightD31B66Higher
Holdings10% weightC45C51Higher
Durability5% weightD27C41Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MART and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

TENJ ranks 3rd and MART 27th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 27CBJANInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 27CMARTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETFScore 55
  7. Rank 27CSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MARTCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF

TENJBiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

In short

MART A March-reset buffer fund: it absorbs the first 10% of a year's drop in an S&P 500 ETF and caps the upside for that stretch in exchange. Standard recipe for the category, priced a shade under the typical rival.

TENJ No data

Stated mandate

MART The Fund seeks to provide downside-loss protection covering the first 10% of losses on its Underlying ETF, before fees and expenses.

TENJ No data

Why people hold it

  • MART The contract is legible: over each one-year period starting in March, the first 10% of the S&P 500 ETF's losses are absorbed before fees and expenses, with upside capped at a level set that March.
  • A 0.74% fee undercuts the typical S&P 500 buffer fund, which matters in a wrapper where the cushion is measured before fees and expenses.
  • No exotic reference: the fund tracks outcomes against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, and the combination of plain benchmark and low fee puts it in the upper half of a crowded buffer cohort.

TENJ No data

Worth knowing

  • MART Small asset base, light volume. Spreads can widen, so limit orders and a glance at intraday value matter more here than with a mega-cap index fund.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the headline 10%. The design lines up cleanly only from one March reset to the next.
  • Income isn't part of the package; returns show up in price. Cheaper buffer builds exist in the same cohort, like PSFF at 0.10% and BUFP at 0.50%.

TENJ No data

Full MART profile⁠

Full TENJ profile⁠

MART vs TENJ Holdings

How MART and TENJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MART and 0.0% of TENJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for TENJ.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MART and TENJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in MARTMore in TENJ
United StatesTENJ +0.1 points
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoMART +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MART102.8%
  • TENJ102.6%

Securities held

  • MART2
  • TENJ2

Asset class

MART
Equity
TENJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in MART2
  • In both0
  • Only in TENJ2

Only in MART

2 securities, 100% of MART by weight

  • Spy 02/26/2027 5.08 C101.83%
  • Spy 02/26/2027 685.92 P0.96%

Only in TENJ

2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight

  • Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
  • JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%

Weight gaps

MART and TENJ share no securities.

All 5 MART holdings⁠All TENJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MART vs TENJ Cost

Overpaying MART vs TENJ

$3,771

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MART 0.74%

    $14,307

  • TENJ 0.53%

    $10,536

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MART 0.74%
  • TENJ 0.53%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530MART $14,307TENJ $10,536

Year by year

YearMARTTENJOverpaying
10$1,319$953$366
20$5,015$3,658$1,357
30$14,307$10,536$3,771

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%MART
  • 0.53%TENJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds

MART 17th cheapest of 77 funds

MART vs TENJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
MART None
TENJ No data
Last payment
MART No data
TENJ $0.07
Ex-dividend
MART No data
TENJ Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
MART No data
TENJ Dec 29, 2025
Frequency
MART No data
TENJ Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

MARTAll MART payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TENJIrregular · 1 paymentAll TENJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD

MART vs TENJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
MART 7.5%TENJ 8.6%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
MART 1.61TENJ 0.90since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
MART −11.6%since Mar 2023TENJ −5.5%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MART 0.60TENJ 0.63

Popular comparisons

  • MARTCvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TENJBvsZALTA

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARTCvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TENJBvsAUGPB

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MARTCvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TENJBvsSIXJB

    iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.53% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.