VTES ranks 1st and AUSM 17th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
AUSM vs VTES
VTES −0.14pt a year
0.19%0.05%
VTES 106.9×the volume
4.66K498K
AUSM vs VTES Performance
+2.4%+1.6%
- AUSM 0.19%
- VTES 0.05%, better
- AUSM $33M
- VTES $3.6B
- AUSM +2.4%, better
- VTES +1.6%
- AUSM 2.78%, better
- VTES 2.67%
- AUSM 107
- VTES 3913
- AUSM 4.66K sh
- VTES 498K sh, better
- AUSM $24.96
- VTES $100.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUSM | VTES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B57Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | F23 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | B63Higher |
| Durability | F13 | A83Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. AUSM and VTES are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUSMB
VTESA
In short
AUSM An actively run muni cash sleeve in ETF clothing: Allspring aims to keep average effective maturity at one year or less, hunting federally tax-exempt income at the sleepy end of the curve. Fee is 0.19%, with no waiver involved.
VTES Vanguard's muni ETF on a short leash: an AMT-free tax-exempt index, but capped at seven years to trim interest-rate sensitivity. Five basis points, roughly 2,700 bonds, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
AUSM The Fund seeks current income exempt from federal income tax while preserving capital. It invests principally in short-term municipal securities and generally expects a dollar-weighted average effective maturity of one year or less.
VTES The Fund seeks to track an index representing investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds with remaining maturities from one month through seven years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUSM vs VTES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUSM vs VTES Cost
Overpaying AUSM vs VTES
$2,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUSM 0.19%
$3,952
VTES 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUSM | VTES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $92 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $360 | $991 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $1,060 | $2,892 |
- 0.19%AUSM
- 0.05%VTES, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
VTES cheapest of 27 funds
AUSM 10th cheapest of 27 funds
AUSM vs VTES Dividends
- AUSM 2.78%, better
- VTES 2.67%
- AUSM $0.69
- VTES $2.69
- AUSM $0.06
- VTES $0.19
- AUSM Oct 23, 2026
- VTES Oct 1, 2026
- AUSM Oct 27, 2026
- VTES Oct 5, 2026
- AUSM Monthly
- VTES Monthly
Distribution history
AUSM vs VTES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUSM 1.3%VTES 2.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUSM −1.00VTES −0.33
- Worst fall
- AUSM −0.9%VTES −3.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AUSM 0.02VTES 0.37
AUSM and VTES in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
