AVES ranks 2nd and FTHF 19th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
AVES vs FTHF
AVES −0.39pt a year
0.36%0.75%
AVES 5.5×the volume
98.2K17.7K
FTHF +15.4pt
+17.7%+33.1%
AVES vs FTHF Performance
+7.8%+41.5%
- AVES 0.36%, better
- FTHF 0.75%
- AVES $1.45B
- FTHF $135M
- AVES +7.8%
- FTHF +41.5%, better
- AVES 3.69%, better
- FTHF 3.55%
- AVES 1998
- FTHF 105
- AVES 98.2K sh, better
- FTHF 17.7K sh
- AVES $60.00
- FTHF $42.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVES | FTHF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | C52Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | D30 |
| Durability | B57Higher | C45 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. AVES and FTHF are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVESA
FTHFD
In short
AVES Avantis starts with the emerging markets universe and tilts it: cheap valuations, profitable companies, roughly 1,800 names from megacaps down to small caps. Broad EM exposure with a deliberate value-and-quality slant, priced under the typical multifactor rival.
FTHF First Trust's emerging markets fund tracks a "human flourishing" index, layering profitability and quality screens onto roughly 100 EM stocks. No other fund in its peer group follows the same benchmark.
Stated mandate
AVES The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
FTHF The fund seeks to track the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index before fees and expenses and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVES vs FTHF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVES vs FTHF Cost
Overpaying FTHF vs AVES
$7,162
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVES 0.36%
$7,320
FTHF 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVES | FTHF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $1,336 | $684 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $5,078 | $2,556 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $14,482 | $7,162 |
- 0.36%AVES, cheaper
- 0.75%FTHF
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
AVES 8th cheapest of 20 funds
FTHF 18th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES vs FTHF Dividends
- AVES 3.69%, better
- FTHF 3.55%
- AVES $2.23
- FTHF $1.52
- AVES $0.62
- FTHF $0.23
- AVES Sep 8, 2026
- FTHF Sep 24, 2026
- AVES Sep 10, 2026
- FTHF Sep 30, 2026
- AVES Quarterly
- FTHF Quarterly
Distribution history
AVES vs FTHF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVES 14.7%, betterFTHF 24.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVES 0.88FTHF 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- AVES −27.4%FTHF −21.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AVES 0.98FTHF 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.