Skip to content

FTHF vs QEMM

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF

FTHFDNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

QEMMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

16.1%by weight

Expense ratio

QEMM −0.45pt a year

FTHF0.75%QEMM0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

FTHF 4.6×the volume

FTHF17.7KQEMM3.85K

3Y return · a year

FTHF +14.9pt

FTHF+33.1%QEMM+18.2%

FTHF vs QEMM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+41.5%FTHF+16.5%QEMM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FTHF +41.5%. QEMM +16.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FTHF 0.75%
QEMM 0.30%, better
Fund size
FTHF $135M
QEMM $56M
1Y total return
FTHF +41.5%, better
QEMM +16.5%
Yield (12M)
FTHF 3.55%
QEMM 4.66%, better
Holdings
FTHF 105
QEMM 836
Avg volume (30D)
FTHF 17.7K sh, better
QEMM 3.85K sh
NAV per share
FTHF $42.80
QEMM $76.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTHF: Cost 11, Risk 34, Mission 85, Tradability 43, Holdings 30, Durability 45. QEMM: Cost 82, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 59, Durability 52.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTHF, QEMM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTHFQEMM
Cost30% weightF11A82Higher
Mission25% weightA85Not scored
Risk15% weightD34B67Higher
Tradability15% weightC43HigherD38
Holdings10% weightD30B59Higher
Durability5% weightC45C52Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTHF and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

QEMM ranks 4th and FTHF 19th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AEMGFiShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AAVESAvantis Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3AFDEMFidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BQEMMState Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BDFEVDimensional Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 18DTLTENorthern Trust Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt ETFScore 31
  7. Rank 19DFTHFFirst Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETFScore 26
  8. VEEMNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTHFDFirst Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF

QEMMBState Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

In short

FTHF First Trust's emerging markets fund tracks a "human flourishing" index, layering profitability and quality screens onto roughly 100 EM stocks. No other fund in its peer group follows the same benchmark.

QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.

Stated mandate

FTHF The fund seeks to track the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index before fees and expenses and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that index.

QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.

Why people hold it

  • FTHF A mandate nobody else runs: it is the only fund in its emerging markets multifactor peer group tracking the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index.ftportfolios.com
  • The index screen is advertised on profitability and quality, so the basket leans toward EM companies that earn their keep rather than whoever has the biggest market cap.ftportfolios.com
  • Rules-based and readable: roughly 100 stocks, with at least 80% of net assets normally in index constituents. You can see what you own and why.ftportfolios.com
  • Distributions run on a quarterly schedule, the standard cadence for a diversified equity index fund.
  • QEMM One ticket, three tilts: the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series Index blends value, quality and low volatility, so no single style has to be in favor for the strategy to run as designed.ssga.com
  • At 0.30% a year it undercuts the typical fee in the multifactor emerging-markets crowd, and the portfolio is built by index rules rather than a manager's hunch.
  • Running since 2014 with roughly 800 holdings and State Street behind the wrapper: a long-lived option in a corner of the market where niche products often quietly close.
  • The low-volatility sleeve is the tell. This is emerging-markets exposure assembled to smooth the ride, not to chase the hottest single factor.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • FTHF The specialty index carries a specialty price: 0.75% a year, versus 0.26% at EMGF and 0.36% at AVES. You are paying up for the screen.
  • Launched in 2023 and thinly traded, so the record is short and spreads can run wider than in the category's household-name funds.
  • It is emerging markets equity, full stop: currency swings, local politics and single-country concentration ride along with the factor screen.
  • QEMM Trades thinner than the category's household names, so spreads can be wider. That bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Splitting the bet three ways dilutes each factor by design, so the portfolio rarely looks or moves like a plain-vanilla emerging-markets index.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year rather than quarterly, and peers such as EMGF carry a lower fee for multifactor EM exposure.

Full FTHF profile⁠

Full QEMM profile⁠

FTHF vs QEMM Holdings

How FTHF and QEMM differ

Overlap by weight

16.1%

Shared holdings make up 41.6% of FTHF and 21.8% of QEMM.

Level by level

  • Holdings44 in both16.1%
  • Countryby domicile44.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors81.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in FTHF and QEMM, widest gap first
SectorMore in FTHFMore in QEMM
TechnologyFTHF +10.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQEMM +6.1 points
CommunicationQEMM +5.8 points
FinancialsFTHF +5.3 points
Health CareQEMM +2.9 points
Consumer StaplesQEMM +2.5 points
MaterialsFTHF +1.4 points
EnergyFTHF +1.1 points
Real EstateQEMM +0.8 points
UtilitiesQEMM +0.7 points
IndustrialsFTHF +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FTHF and QEMM, widest gap first
CountryMore in FTHFMore in QEMM
ChinaQEMM +23.8 points
South AfricaFTHF +16.2 points
IndiaQEMM +15.2 points
TaiwanQEMM +10.9 points
BrazilFTHF +10.5 points
MexicoFTHF +8.7 points
South KoreaFTHF +7.2 points
PolandFTHF +5.4 points
Other countries (10)FTHF +1.8 points

Outside the US: FTHF 0% developed, 100% emerging. QEMM 0% developed, 100% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FTHF45.8%
  • QEMM24.5%

Securities held

  • FTHF101
  • QEMM813

Asset class

FTHF
Equity
QEMM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in FTHF57
  • In both44
  • Only in QEMM769

Only in FTHF

57 securities, 57.9% of FTHF by weight

  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.7.28%
  • SK Hynix Inc.6.85%
  • Gold Fields Limited3.99%

Only in QEMM

769 securities, 77.6% of QEMM by weight

  • Russian Ruble5.24%
  • China Construction Bank H1.56%
  • Samsung Electronics Co Ltd1.45%

Weight gaps

All 44 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in FTHF and QEMM, widest gap first
HoldingMore in FTHFMore in QEMM
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) (Preference Shares)FTHF +4.46 points
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. (Preference Shares)FTHF +3.61 points
Weg S.a.FTHF +3.14 points
Powszechna Kasa Oszczednosci Bank Polski S.A.FTHF +1.75 points
KGHM Polska Miedz S.A.FTHF +1.50 points
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.FTHF +1.24 points
MediaTek Inc.QEMM +1.09 points
Bank Pekao S.A.FTHF +0.97 points

All 101 FTHF holdings⁠All 789 QEMM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTHF vs QEMM Cost

Overpaying FTHF vs QEMM

$8,333

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTHF 0.75%

    $14,482

  • QEMM 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTHF 0.75%
  • QEMM 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530FTHF $14,482QEMM $6,149

Year by year

YearFTHFQEMMOverpaying
10$1,336$545$791
20$5,078$2,113$2,965
30$14,482$6,149$8,333

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%FTHF
  • 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds

FTHF 18th cheapest of 20 funds

FTHF vs QEMM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTHF 3.55%
QEMM 4.66%, better
Payout (12M)
FTHF $1.52
QEMM $3.52
Last payment
FTHF $0.23
QEMM $1.05
Ex-dividend
FTHF Sep 24, 2026
QEMM Jun 1, 2026
Paid on
FTHF Sep 30, 2026
QEMM Jun 5, 2026
Frequency
FTHF Quarterly
QEMM Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTHFQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll FTHF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2023 $0.12; Mar 21, 2024 $0.05; Jun 27, 2024 $0.21; Sep 26, 2024 $0.22; Dec 13, 2024 $0.22; Mar 27, 2025 $0.03; Jun 26, 2025 $0.26; Sep 25, 2025 $0.21; Dec 12, 2025 $0.96; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.27; Sep 24, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
QEMMTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll QEMM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.42; Dec 15, 2017 $0.94; Jun 1, 2018 $0.37; Dec 21, 2018 $1.19; Jun 3, 2019 $0.52; Dec 20, 2019 $1.33; Jun 1, 2020 $0.48; Dec 18, 2020 $1.14; Jun 1, 2021 $0.36; Dec 17, 2021 $1.23; Jun 1, 2022 $0.59; Dec 16, 2022 $1.59; Jun 1, 2023 $1.23; Dec 15, 2023 $1.56; Jun 3, 2024 $1.20; Dec 18, 2024 $1.75; Jun 2, 2025 $0.76; Nov 25, 2025 $2.48; Jun 1, 2026 $1.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

FTHF vs QEMM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTHF 24.2%QEMM 13.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTHF 1.13, betterQEMM 1.00
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTHF −21.1%since Oct 2023QEMM −27.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTHF 1.01QEMM 0.95

Popular comparisons

  • FTHFDvsEMGFA

    First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsEMGFA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTHFDvsAVESA

    First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsAVESA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTHFDvsFDEMA

    First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsFDEMA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.