FDEM ranks 3rd and FTHF 19th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FDEM vs FTHF
FDEM −0.50pt a year
0.25%0.75%
FDEM 4.9×the volume
87.5K17.7K
FTHF +13.1pt
+20.0%+33.1%
FDEM vs FTHF Performance
+12.2%+41.5%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- FTHF 0.75%
- FDEM $591M
- FTHF $135M
- FDEM +12.2%
- FTHF +41.5%, better
- FDEM 3.49%
- FTHF 3.55%, better
- FDEM 229
- FTHF 105
- FDEM 87.5K sh, better
- FTHF 17.7K sh
- FDEM $33.73
- FTHF $42.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEM | FTHF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F11 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B56Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | C42Higher | D30 |
| Durability | B65Higher | C45 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEM and FTHF are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEMA
FTHFD
In short
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
FTHF First Trust's emerging markets fund tracks a "human flourishing" index, layering profitability and quality screens onto roughly 100 EM stocks. No other fund in its peer group follows the same benchmark.
Stated mandate
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
FTHF The fund seeks to track the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index before fees and expenses and normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEM vs FTHF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEM vs FTHF Cost
Overpaying FTHF vs FDEM
$9,323
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
FTHF 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEM | FTHF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $1,336 | $881 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $5,078 | $3,309 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $14,482 | $9,323 |
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- 0.75%FTHF
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
FTHF 18th cheapest of 20 funds
FDEM vs FTHF Dividends
- FDEM 3.49%
- FTHF 3.55%, better
- FDEM $1.17
- FTHF $1.52
- FDEM $0.38
- FTHF $0.23
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- FTHF Sep 24, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- FTHF Sep 30, 2026
- FDEM Quarterly
- FTHF Quarterly
Distribution history
FDEM vs FTHF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEM 13.8%, betterFTHF 24.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEM 1.08FTHF 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- FDEM −24.2%FTHF −21.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FDEM 0.98FTHF 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.