AVSF ranks 3rd and NUSA 7th of 12 funds in the Short-Term Core Bond Category.
AVSF vs NUSA
NUSA −0.01pt a year
0.15%0.14%
AVSF 8.5×the volume
62.8K7.41K
AVSF +0.4pt
+2.1%+1.7%
AVSF vs NUSA Performance
+10.7%+8.7%
- AVSF 0.15%
- NUSA 0.14%, better
- AVSF $642M
- NUSA $37M
- AVSF +1.8%, better
- NUSA +1.3%
- AVSF 4.36%, better
- NUSA 3.92%
- AVSF 485
- NUSA 356
- AVSF 62.8K sh, better
- NUSA 7.41K sh
- AVSF $45.99
- NUSA $22.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVSF | NUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A72Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | C43 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | D38 |
| Durability | B66Higher | D38 |
Rank among Short-Term Core Bond funds
Same Category. AVSF and NUSA are both graded against the same 12 Short-Term Core Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVSFB
NUSAC
In short
AVSF Active bond management at an index-fund price. Avantis works the short end of the curve, the 1-5 year government and credit zone, across roughly 500 positions, for 0.15% a year.
NUSA An ESG screen applied to the quiet end of the bond market: roughly 300 investment-grade bonds maturing inside five years, for 0.14% a year while the typical core-bond fund charges more than double that.
Stated mandate
AVSF The fund seeks to maximize total return by investing broadly in short-term debt obligations across sectors, maturities, and issuers. It uses active portfolio management informed by current yields, interest rates, credit metrics, and other investment considerations.
NUSA The fund seeks to track the investment results of its index, which is designed to capture the 1-5 year segment of the U.S. aggregate bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVSF vs NUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVSF vs NUSA Cost
Overpaying AVSF vs NUSA
$205
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVSF 0.15%
$3,137
NUSA 0.14%
$2,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVSF | NUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $256 | $18 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,000 | $71 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $2,932 | $205 |
- 0.15%AVSF
- 0.14%NUSA, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Term Core Bond funds
- Median 0.20%
NUSA 4th cheapest of 12 funds
AVSF 5th cheapest of 12 funds
AVSF vs NUSA Dividends
- AVSF 4.36%, better
- NUSA 3.92%
- AVSF $2.00
- NUSA $0.90
- AVSF $0.17
- NUSA $0.08
- AVSF Oct 6, 2026
- NUSA Oct 1, 2026
- AVSF Oct 8, 2026
- NUSA Oct 2, 2026
- AVSF Monthly
- NUSA Monthly
Distribution history
AVSF vs NUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AVSF
- NUSA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVSF 2.3%, betterNUSA 2.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVSF 0.14, betterNUSA 0.003
- Worst fall
- AVSF −8.3%, betterNUSA −8.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AVSF 0.35NUSA 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.