BSV ranks 1st and NUSA 7th of 12 funds in the Short-Term Core Bond Category.
BSV vs NUSA
BSV −0.11pt a year
0.03%0.14%
BSV 385.2×the volume
2.86M7.41K
BSV +0.2pt
+1.9%+1.7%
BSV vs NUSA Performance
+9.7%+8.7%
- BSV 0.03%, better
- NUSA 0.14%
- BSV $69.6B
- NUSA $37M
- BSV +1.6%, better
- NUSA +1.3%
- BSV 4.08%, better
- NUSA 3.92%
- BSV 3159
- NUSA 356
- BSV 2.86M sh, better
- NUSA 7.41K sh
- BSV $77.05
- NUSA $22.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSV | NUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A72 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | C43 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A95Higher | D38 |
Rank among Short-Term Core Bond funds
Same Category. BSV and NUSA are both graded against the same 12 Short-Term Core Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSVA
NUSAC
In short
BSV The short end of Vanguard's bond lineup: investment-grade US government and corporate paper capped at one to five years, for three basis points a year. Same indexing discipline as its total-market sibling, with far less rate whiplash.
NUSA An ESG screen applied to the quiet end of the bond market: roughly 300 investment-grade bonds maturing inside five years, for 0.14% a year while the typical core-bond fund charges more than double that.
Stated mandate
BSV The fund seeks to track a market-weighted bond index with a short-term dollar-weighted average maturity.
NUSA The fund seeks to track the investment results of its index, which is designed to capture the 1-5 year segment of the U.S. aggregate bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSV vs NUSA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSV vs NUSA Cost
Overpaying NUSA vs BSV
$2,294
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSV 0.03%
$638
NUSA 0.14%
$2,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSV | NUSA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $256 | $201 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,000 | $784 |
| 30 | $638 | $2,932 | $2,294 |
- 0.03%BSV, cheaper
- 0.14%NUSA
- Middle half of Short-Term Core Bond funds
- Median 0.20%
BSV cheapest of 12 funds
NUSA 4th cheapest of 12 funds
BSV vs NUSA Dividends
- BSV 4.08%, better
- NUSA 3.92%
- BSV $3.15
- NUSA $0.90
- BSV $0.27
- NUSA $0.08
- BSV Oct 1, 2026
- NUSA Oct 1, 2026
- BSV Oct 5, 2026
- NUSA Oct 2, 2026
- BSV Monthly
- NUSA Monthly
Distribution history
BSV vs NUSA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSV
- NUSA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSV 2.4%, betterNUSA 2.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BSV 0.06, betterNUSA 0.003
- Worst fall
- BSV −8.0%, betterNUSA −8.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSV 0.38NUSA 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.