BAMA vs UCBG: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Brookstone Active ETF

BAMADCboe

State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

UCBGANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

UCBG −0.95pt a year

BAMA1.01%UCBG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

UCBG 966.3×the volume

BAMA4.3KUCBG4.15M

BAMA vs UCBG Performance

Oct 6, 2026 – Nov 6, 2026

−5.3%BAMA−5.0%UCBG

Expense ratio: BAMA 1.01%; UCBG 0.06%, better
Fund size: BAMA $45M; UCBG $2.42B
1Y total return: BAMA +5.8%; UCBG No data
Yield (12M): BAMA 1.48%; UCBG No data
Holdings: BAMA 7; UCBG 886
Avg volume (30D): BAMA 4.3K sh; UCBG 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share: BAMA $35.15; UCBG $48.42
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for BAMA, UCBG, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	BAMA	UCBG
Cost30% weight	F14	A100Higher
Mission25% weight	C44	A99Higher
Risk15% weight	C46	Not scored
Tradability15% weight	C51	A99Higher
Holdings10% weight	D34	A79Higher
Durability5% weight	C52	B66Higher

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. BAMA and UCBG are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 36 funds

See all 36 ›

UCBG ranks 1st and BAMA 30th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
Rank 29DBAMOBrookstone Opportunities ETFScore 36
Rank 30DBAMABrookstone Active ETFScore 35
Rank 30DFDATTactical Advantage ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAMADBrookstone Active ETF

UCBGAState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

In short

BAMA Brookstone's tactical sleeve in a wrapper: a handful of unaffiliated ETFs that can swing from all-in on stocks to all-out in Treasuries and cash. Price of that freedom: 1.01% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

UCBG No data

Stated mandate

BAMA The Fund seeks total return through active allocation among unaffiliated ETFs covering domestic and foreign equities, bonds, cash and cash equivalents, and potentially leveraged ETFs. Asset-class weightings may change with market conditions.

UCBG No data

Why people hold it

BAMA The mandate is genuinely unconstrained: global stocks, bonds including junk, cash, even leveraged ETFs, with weights shifting as the adviser's outlook shifts.sec.gov
A fee waiver trims the 1.04% gross charge to 1.01% net through September 30, 2027. Distributions arrive quarterly.
One ticket buys the allocation calls of a multi-billion-dollar RIA, live since 2023 as part of an eight-ETF Brookstone lineup.brookstonecm.com cboe.com

UCBG No data

Worth knowing

BAMA At 1.01% net, it sits above the allocation category's typical fee, and far above index-built peers like UCBG at 0.06% and IRTR at 0.08%.
A small fund that trades lightly, so spreads and order size matter more here than in the category's giants.
No index to measure it against: results ride on the adviser's timing, and any leveraged ETF it holds tracks daily moves, not long stretches.sec.gov

UCBG No data

Full BAMA profile⁠

Full UCBG profile⁠

BAMA vs UCBG Holdings

How BAMA and UCBG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: BAMA holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Sector15 Sectors78.1%
Countryby domicile81.1%

Sector

Sector weights in BAMA and UCBG, widest gap first
Sector	Gap	BAMA	UCBG
Government	BAMA +10.6 points	10.6%	0.0%
Technology	UCBG +8.6 points	29.6%	38.2%
Securitized	BAMA +5.3 points	5.3%	0.0%
Corporate	BAMA +5.2 points	5.2%	0.0%
Health Care	UCBG +3.6 points	6.7%	10.3%
Consumer Discretionary	UCBG +2.2 points	7.0%	9.2%
Energy	UCBG +2.0 points	1.9%	3.9%
Consumer Staples	UCBG +1.9 points	3.0%	4.9%
Industrials	UCBG +1.0 points	6.6%	7.6%
Communication	UCBG +0.9 points	7.5%	8.4%
Utilities	UCBG +0.7 points	1.4%	2.1%
Materials	BAMA +0.7 points	2.3%	1.6%
Real Estate	UCBG +0.6 points	1.2%	1.8%
Financials	UCBG +0.5 points	11.6%	12.1%
Municipal	BAMA +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BAMA and UCBG, widest gap first
Country	Gap	BAMA	UCBG
United States	UCBG +17.7 points	78.2%	95.9%
Taiwan	BAMA +2.9 points	2.9%	0.0%
Japan	BAMA +2.4 points	2.7%	0.3%
South Korea	BAMA +2.0 points	2.0%	0.0%
China	BAMA +1.8 points	1.8%	0.0%
India	BAMA +1.4 points	1.4%	0.0%
South Africa	BAMA +1.0 points	1.0%	0.0%
Germany	BAMA +0.9 points	0.9%	0.0%
Other countries (33)	BAMA +5.3 points	9.1%	3.8%

Outside the US: BAMA 52% developed, 48% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

BAMA100.1%
UCBG33.6%

Securities held

BAMA7
UCBG884

Asset class

BAMA: Stocks
UCBG: Multi-Asset

Holdings

Only in BAMA7
In both0
Only in UCBG884

Only in BAMA

7 securities, 100% of BAMA by weight

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF USD Class23.20%
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF USD Class22.54%
State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond Index ETF18.35%
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF USD Class14.20%
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF10.48%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF USD Class10.36%
Bbh Sweep Vehicle1.00%

Only in UCBG

884 securities, 99.8% of UCBG by weight

Apple Inc7.09%
NVIDIA Corp6.21%
Microsoft Corp5.62%
Amazon.com Inc3.61%
Alphabet Inc Class A2.34%
Broadcom Inc1.95%
Alphabet Inc Class C1.89%
Meta Platforms Inc Class A1.88%
Eli Lilly & Co1.54%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.50%
Tesla Inc1.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.27%
Micron Technology Inc1.05%
Visa Inc Class A Shares1.02%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp0.96%
Advanced Micro Devices0.93%
Johnson & Johnson0.93%
Walmart Inc0.80%
Mastercard Inc A0.75%
AbbVie Inc0.72%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.67%
Chevron Corp0.59%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.55%
Cisco Systems Inc0.53%
Coca Cola Co/The0.52%
Merck & Co. Inc.0.51%
Palantir Technologies Inc A0.50%
UnitedHealth Group Inc0.50%
Home Depot Inc0.49%
General Electric0.46%
Bank of America Corp0.46%
Philip Morris International0.44%
Netflix Inc0.39%
Rtx Corp0.37%
Intel Corp0.37%
Palo Alto Networks Inc0.36%
Wells Fargo & Co0.36%
Caterpillar Inc0.36%
Texas Instruments Inc0.36%
Applied Materials Inc0.36%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc0.36%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.35%
Amgen Inc0.35%
Linde PLC0.34%
Intl Business Machines Corp0.33%
Lam Research Corp0.33%
Oracle Corp0.32%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc A0.31%
Morgan Stanley0.31%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.29%

Weight gaps

BAMA and UCBG share no securities.

All 8 BAMA holdings⁠All 503 UCBG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAMA vs UCBG Cost

Overpaying BAMA vs UCBG

$17,580

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

BAMA 1.01%
$18,850
UCBG 0.06%
$1,270

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

BAMA 1.01%
UCBG 0.06%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	BAMA	UCBG	Overpaying
10	$1,780	$110	$1,670
20	$6,686	$432	$6,254
30	$18,850	$1,270	$17,580

Expense ratio

1.01%BAMA
0.06%UCBG, cheaper

UCBG0.06%BAMA1.01%

0.06%1.36%

Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Median 0.61%

UCBG cheapest of 36 funds

BAMA 31st cheapest of 36 funds

BAMA vs UCBG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026

Yield (12M): BAMA 1.48%; UCBG No data
Payout (12M): BAMA $0.52; UCBG No data
Last payment: BAMA $0.17; UCBG $0.04
Ex-dividend: BAMA Aug 28, 2026; UCBG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on: BAMA Sep 4, 2026; UCBG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency: BAMA Quarterly; UCBG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BAMAQuarterly · 11 paymentsAll BAMA payments⁠

UCBGIrregular · 1 paymentAll UCBG payments⁠

BAMA vs UCBG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: BAMA 9.0%UCBG No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: BAMA 1.09UCBG No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: BAMA −12.3%since Sep 2023UCBG No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: BAMA 0.71UCBG 0.00; Market = 1

BAMA and UCBG in the news

All news⁠

Category Review
The fund built to limit losses had the category's worst return
Sep 25, 2026UCBG
ETF Filings
Leverage Shares files 2x shorts on ByteDance and Canva
Sep 6, 2026UCBG

Popular comparisons

BAMADvsAOAA
Brookstone Active ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Expense ratio
1.01% · 0.15%
Category
UCBGAvsAOAA
State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.15%
Category
BAMADvsIRTRA
Brookstone Active ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
Expense ratio
1.01% · 0.08%
Category
UCBGAvsIRTRA
State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.08%
Category
BAMADvsINCEA
Brookstone Active ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
Expense ratio
1.01% · 0.29%
Category
UCBGAvsINCEA
State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.29%
Category

BAMA vs UCBG

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How BAMA and UCBG differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in BAMA

Only in UCBG

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

The fund built to limit losses had the category's worst return

Leverage Shares files 2x shorts on ByteDance and Canva

How BAMA and UCBG differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in BAMA

Only in UCBG

Weight gaps