IRTR ranks 3rd and BAMA 30th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
BAMA vs IRTR
IRTR −0.93pt a year
1.01%0.08%
IRTR 2.9×the volume
4.3K12.6K
BAMA +1.2pt
+13.1%+11.9%
BAMA vs IRTR Performance
+5.8%+5.2%
- BAMA 1.01%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- BAMA $45M
- IRTR $59M
- BAMA +5.8%, better
- IRTR +5.2%
- BAMA 1.48%
- IRTR 3.21%, better
- BAMA 7
- IRTR 29136
- BAMA 4.3K sh
- IRTR 12.6K sh, better
- BAMA $35.15
- IRTR $31.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMA | IRTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F14 | A97Higher |
| Mission | C44 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C46 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A79Higher |
| Durability | C52 | B56Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. BAMA and IRTR are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMAD
IRTRA
In short
BAMA Brookstone's tactical sleeve in a wrapper: a handful of unaffiliated ETFs that can swing from all-in on stocks to all-out in Treasuries and cash. Price of that freedom: 1.01% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
Stated mandate
BAMA The Fund seeks total return through active allocation among unaffiliated ETFs covering domestic and foreign equities, bonds, cash and cash equivalents, and potentially leveraged ETFs. Asset-class weightings may change with market conditions.
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMA vs IRTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMA vs IRTR Cost
Overpaying BAMA vs IRTR
$17,161
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMA 1.01%
$18,850
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMA | IRTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $147 | $1,633 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $575 | $6,111 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $1,689 | $17,161 |
- 1.01%BAMA
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.61%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 36 funds
BAMA 31st cheapest of 36 funds
BAMA vs IRTR Dividends
- BAMA 1.48%
- IRTR 3.21%, better
- BAMA $0.52
- IRTR $1.00
- BAMA $0.17
- IRTR $0.07
- BAMA Aug 28, 2026
- IRTR Nov 3, 2026
- BAMA Sep 4, 2026
- IRTR Nov 6, 2026
- BAMA Quarterly
- IRTR Monthly
Distribution history
BAMA vs IRTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMA 9.0%IRTR 7.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMA 1.09IRTR 1.14, better
- Worst fall
- BAMA −12.3%IRTR −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMA 0.71IRTR 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.