Skip to content

BAMA vs INCE

Brookstone Active ETF

BAMADCboe

Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

INCEANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

INCE −0.72pt a year

BAMA1.01%INCE0.29%

Avg volume · 30D

INCE 11.1×the volume

BAMA4.3KINCE47.6K

3Y return · a year

INCE +4.0pt

BAMA+13.1%INCE+17.1%

BAMA vs INCE Performance

Nov 6, 2025 – Nov 6, 2026

+5.8%BAMA+21.1%INCE

Nov 6, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026. BAMA +5.8%. INCE +21.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%25%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BAMA 1.01%
INCE 0.29%, better
Fund size
BAMA $45M
INCE $360M
1Y total return
BAMA +5.8%
INCE +21.1%, better
Yield (12M)
BAMA 1.48%
INCE 5.08%, better
Holdings
BAMA 7
INCE 116
Avg volume (30D)
BAMA 4.3K sh
INCE 47.6K sh, better
NAV per share
BAMA $35.15
INCE $67.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAMA: Cost 14, Risk 46, Mission 44, Tradability 51, Holdings 34, Durability 52. INCE: Cost 82, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 73, Durability 85.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAMA, INCE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBAMAINCE
Cost30% weightF14A82Higher
Mission25% weightC44Not scored
Risk15% weightC46B65Higher
Tradability15% weightC51B64Higher
Holdings10% weightD34A73Higher
Durability5% weightC52A85Higher

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAMA and INCE are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 36 funds
See all 36 ›

INCE ranks 4th and BAMA 30th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 3AIRTRiShares LifePath Retirement ETFScore 86
  4. Rank 4AINCEFranklin Income Equity Focus ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 5AGAACambria Global Asset Allocation ETFScore 71
  6. Rank 29DBAMOBrookstone Opportunities ETFScore 36
  7. Rank 30DBAMABrookstone Active ETFScore 35
  8. Rank 30DFDATTactical Advantage ETFScore 35

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAMADBrookstone Active ETF

INCEAFranklin Income Equity Focus ETF

In short

BAMA Brookstone's tactical sleeve in a wrapper: a handful of unaffiliated ETFs that can swing from all-in on stocks to all-out in Treasuries and cash. Price of that freedom: 1.01% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.

INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.

Stated mandate

BAMA The Fund seeks total return through active allocation among unaffiliated ETFs covering domestic and foreign equities, bonds, cash and cash equivalents, and potentially leveraged ETFs. Asset-class weightings may change with market conditions.

INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.

Why people hold it

  • BAMA The mandate is genuinely unconstrained: global stocks, bonds including junk, cash, even leveraged ETFs, with weights shifting as the adviser's outlook shifts.sec.gov
  • A fee waiver trims the 1.04% gross charge to 1.01% net through September 30, 2027. Distributions arrive quarterly.
  • One ticket buys the allocation calls of a multi-billion-dollar RIA, live since 2023 as part of an eight-ETF Brookstone lineup.brookstonecm.comcboe.com
  • INCE 0.29% a year, less than half what the typical allocation fund charges.
  • Income is the job, and it shows up monthly. The mandate also lets managers move across debt and equity markets rather than sit in one lane.
  • The stated goal is not yield alone: income, capital appreciation, and lower volatility than the S&P 500 are all written into the objective.
  • Undercuts its multi-asset sibling INCM (0.38%) on fee, and sits among the stronger names in a crowded allocation field.

Worth knowing

  • BAMA At 1.01% net, it sits above the allocation category's typical fee, and far above index-built peers like UCBG at 0.06% and IRTR at 0.08%.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so spreads and order size matter more here than in the category's giants.
  • No index to measure it against: results ride on the adviser's timing, and any leveraged ETF it holds tracks daily moves, not long stretches.sec.gov
  • INCE Small and lightly traded next to the giants of its category, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the norm here.
  • Distributions may include return of capital, so part of a monthly payout can be your own money coming back.
  • Equity-forward by design. The aim is a smoother ride than the S&P 500, not bond-like steadiness.

Full BAMA profile⁠

Full INCE profile⁠

BAMA vs INCE Holdings

How BAMA and INCE differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

About this figure: BAMA holds other funds. We compare those funds, not the stocks inside them.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector15 Sectors47.0%
  • Countryby domicile81.7%
  • Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in BAMA and INCE, widest gap first
SectorMore in BAMAMore in INCEGap
TechnologyBAMA +24.9 points
UtilitiesINCE +14.2 points
Consumer StaplesINCE +13.4 points
GovernmentBAMA +10.6 points
EnergyINCE +9.7 points
Health CareINCE +8.3 points
SecuritizedBAMA +5.3 points
CorporateBAMA +5.2 points
IndustrialsINCE +4.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryBAMA +2.9 points
CommunicationBAMA +2.7 points
FinancialsINCE +1.4 points
MaterialsINCE +1.3 points
Real EstateBAMA +1.2 points
MunicipalBAMA +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BAMA and INCE, widest gap first
CountryMore in BAMAMore in INCEGap
United StatesINCE +15.9 points
TaiwanBAMA +2.9 points
JapanBAMA +2.7 points
South KoreaBAMA +2.0 points
ChinaBAMA +1.8 points
FranceINCE +1.5 points
IndiaBAMA +1.4 points
South AfricaBAMA +1.0 points
Other countries (33)BAMA +5.6 points

Outside the US: BAMA 52% developed, 48% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BAMA100.1%
  • INCE25.7%

Securities held

  • BAMA7
  • INCE111

Asset class

BAMA
Stocks
INCE
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in BAMA7
  • In both0
  • Only in INCE111

Only in BAMA

7 securities, 100% of BAMA by weight

  • State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF USD Class23.20%
  • SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF USD Class22.54%
  • State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond Index ETF18.35%

Only in INCE

111 securities, 99.0% of INCE by weight

  • Chevron Corp3.56%
  • Verizon Communications In2.93%
  • Procter & Gamble Co/The2.86%

Weight gaps

BAMA and INCE share no securities.

All 8 BAMA holdings⁠All 113 INCE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAMA vs INCE Cost

Overpaying BAMA vs INCE

$12,898

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAMA 1.01%

    $18,850

  • INCE 0.29%

    $5,952

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAMA 1.01%
  • INCE 0.29%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BAMA $18,850INCE $5,952

Year by year

YearBAMAINCEOverpaying
10$1,780$527$1,253
20$6,686$2,044$4,642
30$18,850$5,952$12,898

Expense ratio

  • 1.01%BAMA
  • 0.29%INCE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.61%

INCE 6th cheapest of 36 funds

BAMA 31st cheapest of 36 funds

BAMA vs INCE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 6, 2026
Yield (12M)
BAMA 1.48%
INCE 5.08%, better
Payout (12M)
BAMA $0.52
INCE $3.42
Last payment
BAMA $0.17
INCE $0.30
Ex-dividend
BAMA Aug 28, 2026
INCE Oct 30, 2026
Paid on
BAMA Sep 4, 2026
INCE Nov 4, 2026
Frequency
BAMA Quarterly
INCE Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BAMAQuarterly · 11 paymentsAll BAMA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2023 $0.12; May 31, 2024 $0.10; Aug 30, 2024 $0.12; Nov 29, 2024 $0.11; Dec 27, 2024 $0.12; May 28, 2025 $0.08; Aug 29, 2025 $0.13; Nov 28, 2025 $0.10; Dec 26, 2025 $0.21; May 28, 2026 $0.04; Aug 28, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
INCEMonthly · 34 paymentsAll INCE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 34 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2023 $0.12; Jun 16, 2023 $0.14; Sep 15, 2023 $0.24; Dec 15, 2023 $0.40; Mar 15, 2024 $0.16; Jun 28, 2024 $0.34; Jul 31, 2024 $0.17; Aug 30, 2024 $0.25; Sep 30, 2024 $0.20; Oct 31, 2024 $0.22; Nov 29, 2024 $0.23; Dec 31, 2024 $0.25; Jan 31, 2025 $0.20; Feb 28, 2025 $0.24; Mar 31, 2025 $0.27; Apr 30, 2025 $0.23; May 30, 2025 $0.27; Jun 30, 2025 $0.24; Jul 31, 2025 $0.21; Aug 29, 2025 $0.26; Sep 30, 2025 $0.29; Oct 31, 2025 $0.22; Nov 28, 2025 $0.23; Dec 30, 2025 $0.22; Jan 30, 2026 $0.29; Feb 27, 2026 $0.30; Mar 31, 2026 $0.35; Apr 30, 2026 $0.34; May 29, 2026 $0.25; Jun 30, 2026 $0.25; Jul 31, 2026 $0.30; Aug 31, 2026 $0.30; Sep 30, 2026 $0.30; Oct 30, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

BAMA vs INCE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAMA 9.0%, betterINCE 10.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAMA 1.09INCE 1.28, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAMA −12.3%since Sep 2023INCE −18.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAMA 0.71INCE 0.60

Popular comparisons

  • BAMADvsUCBGA

    Brookstone Active ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INCEAvsUCBGA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMADvsAOAA

    Brookstone Active ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INCEAvsAOAA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMADvsIRTRA

    Brookstone Active ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • INCEAvsIRTRA

    Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.29% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.