BAMB vs IUSB: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF

BAMBDCboe

iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF

IUSBANasdaq

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

IUSB −0.98pt a year

BAMB1.04%IUSB0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

IUSB 842.4×the volume

BAMB7.27KIUSB6.13M

3Y return · a year

IUSB +2.4pt

BAMB+3.4%IUSB+5.8%

BAMB vs IUSB Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.5%BAMB0.0%IUSB

Expense ratio: BAMB 1.04%; IUSB 0.06%, better
Fund size: BAMB $55M; IUSB $50.2B
1Y total return: BAMB −1.5%; IUSB 0.0%, better
Yield (12M): BAMB 3.08%; IUSB 4.32%, better
Holdings: BAMB 8; IUSB 18280
Avg volume (30D): BAMB 7.27K sh; IUSB 6.13M sh, better
NAV per share: BAMB $25.46; IUSB $44.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for BAMB, IUSB, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	BAMB	IUSB
Cost30% weight	F0	A92Higher
Mission25% weight	A93	A100Higher
Risk15% weight	D31	C54Higher
Tradability15% weight	C46	A89Higher
Holdings10% weight	F22	A76Higher
Durability5% weight	D37	A94Higher

Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. BAMB and IUSB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Aggregate Bond⁠

Category · 114 funds

See all 114 ›

IUSB ranks 2nd and BAMB 101st of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.

Rank 1AAGGiShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETFScore 87
Rank 2AIUSBiShares Core Universal USD Bond ETFScore 86
Rank 2ASCHZSchwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETFScore 86
Rank 100CCGIBCapital Group International Bond ETF (USD-Hedged)Score 40
Rank 101DBAMBBrookstone Intermediate Bond ETFScore 39
Rank 102DWSDBWeitz Short Duration Bond ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAMBDBrookstone Intermediate Bond ETF

IUSBAiShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF

In short

BAMB A 2023-vintage intermediate bond fund with one stated job: current income. The story is the sticker. It charges 1.04% a year in the most commoditized corner of the market, where the index giants work for pennies.

IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.

Stated mandate

BAMB The Fund seeks to provide current income.

IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.

Why people hold it

BAMB Simple mandate, plainly stated: current income from US bonds inside a standard 1940 Act fund. What the portfolio holds lines up closely with what the prospectus says it does.
Income arrives quarterly, a steady calendar rhythm rather than unpredictable lumps.
Live since 2023 and past the seed-capital stage, with a real shareholder base rather than a launch balance sitting on the books.

IUSB 0.06% a year, a fraction of what the typical broad bond fund in its category charges, and iShares has run it since 2014.
Roughly 18,000 bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors, so one ticker covers ground a plain Agg tracker leaves on the table.ishares.com
Tracks its index closely, trades heavily, and sits on a multi-billion-dollar asset base. Income is paid monthly.
Among the strongest implementations in a crowded field of nearly 200 core bond funds.

Worth knowing

BAMB Cost is the trade-off: 1.04% a year, while core bond index rivals such as BND, SPAB and SCHZ charge 0.03%. That gap comes out of income every year.
Thinly traded, so the gap between bid and ask can add to the cost of getting in and out.
In a crowded field of nearly 200 core bond funds, it sits in the lower half, where cheap, broad index trackers set the bar.

IUSB That high-yield sleeve is the trade-off: more credit risk than an investment-grade-only fund, and more movement when spreads widen.
BND, SPAB and SCHZ charge 0.03%, half IUSB's fee, but they stay inside investment grade.
Payouts land monthly, but the amount floats with the coupons underneath. Nothing about the income stream is fixed.

Full BAMB profile⁠

Full IUSB profile⁠

BAMB vs IUSB Holdings

How BAMB and IUSB differ

No overlap figure

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.

Level by level

Countryby domicile88.1%
Asset classFixed Income100%

Sector

No Sector split for BAMB.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BAMB and IUSB, widest gap first
Country	More in BAMBMore in IUSB	BAMB	IUSB
United States	BAMB +11.9 points	100.0%	88.1%
Cayman Islands	IUSB +3.1 points	0.0%	3.1%
Canada	IUSB +1.2 points	0.0%	1.2%
United Kingdom	IUSB +1.0 points	0.0%	1.0%
Japan	IUSB +0.6 points	0.0%	0.6%
Mexico	IUSB +0.5 points	0.0%	0.5%
Other countries (34)	IUSB +5.5 points	0.0%	5.5%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

BAMB100.1%
IUSB8.1%

Securities held

BAMB8
IUSB17,809

Asset class

BAMB: Fixed Income
IUSB: Fixed Income

Holdings

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BAMB holds 8 securities, IUSB 17,809.

All 8 BAMB holdings⁠All 18,365 IUSB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAMB vs IUSB Cost

Overpaying BAMB vs IUSB

$18,064

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

BAMB 1.04%
$19,334
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

BAMB 1.04%
IUSB 0.06%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	BAMB	IUSB	Overpaying
10	$1,831	$110	$1,721
20	$6,867	$432	$6,435
30	$19,334	$1,270	$18,064

Expense ratio

1.04%BAMB
0.06%IUSB, cheaper

IUSB0.06%BAMB1.04%

0.00%1.04%

Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
Median 0.34%

IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds

BAMB 114th cheapest of 114 funds

BAMB vs IUSB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): BAMB 3.08%; IUSB 4.32%, better
Payout (12M): BAMB $0.78; IUSB $1.94
Last payment: BAMB $0.21; IUSB $0.15
Ex-dividend: BAMB Aug 28, 2026; IUSB Oct 1, 2026
Paid on: BAMB Sep 4, 2026; IUSB Oct 6, 2026
Frequency: BAMB Quarterly; IUSB Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BAMBQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll BAMB payments⁠

IUSBMonthly · 45 paymentsAll IUSB payments⁠

BAMB vs IUSB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: BAMB 4.2%, betterIUSB 5.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: BAMB −0.25IUSB 0.25, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: BAMB −5.6%since Sep 2023IUSB −17.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: BAMB 0.06IUSB 0.96; Market = 1

BAMB and IUSB in the news

All news⁠

ETF Filings
BondBloxx registers a 0.22% core-plus bond ETF, and two funds still not for sale
Oct 21, 2026IUSB

Popular comparisons

BAMBDvsAGGA
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF · iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio
1.04% · 0.03%
Category
IUSBAvsAGGA
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF · iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.03%
Category
BAMBDvsSCHZA
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF · Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio
1.04% · 0.03%
Category
IUSBAvsSCHZA
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF · Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.03%
Category
BAMBDvsSPABA
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio
1.04% · 0.03%
Category
IUSBAvsSPABA
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF
Expense ratio
0.06% · 0.03%
Category

BAMB vs IUSB

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How BAMB and IUSB differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

BondBloxx registers a 0.22% core-plus bond ETF, and two funds still not for sale

How BAMB and IUSB differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings