FGDL ranks 4th and BAR 6th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.
BAR vs FGDL
FGDL −0.02pt a year
0.17%0.15%
BAR 12.9×the volume
221K17.1K
FGDL +0.1pt
+25.5%+25.6%
BAR vs FGDL Performance
−1.6%−1.4%
- BAR 0.17%
- FGDL 0.15%, better
- BAR $1.26B
- FGDL $406M
- BAR −1.6%
- FGDL −1.4%, better
- BAR 1
- FGDL 1
- BAR 221K sh, better
- FGDL 17.1K sh
- BAR $38.50
- FGDL $52.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAR | FGDL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A77Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C49 |
| Tradability | D30 | D31Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C41Higher | D32 |
Rank among Physical Gold funds
Same Category. BAR and FGDL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BARB
FGDLB
In short
BAR Real bars in a London vault, listed one by one on the sponsor's site every day. BAR landed in 2017 as the boutique fee-fighter among gold trusts: no lending, no derivatives, a 0.17% sponsor fee.
FGDL Gold with a paper trail. FGDL holds only London Good Delivery bars refined since January 1, 2012, the vintage covered by the LBMA's Responsible Gold Guidance, for a 0.15% sponsor fee.
Stated mandate
BAR The Trust seeks to have each Share’s value reflect the value of its gold assets after accrued expenses and liabilities, providing a simple way to invest similarly to gold.
FGDL The Fund seeks to track the price of gold bullion, after deducting expenses. Its assets consist only of gold bullion and cash, if any.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAR vs FGDL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAR vs FGDL Cost
Overpaying BAR vs FGDL
$409
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAR 0.17%
$3,546
FGDL 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAR | FGDL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $274 | $36 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $1,071 | $140 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $3,137 | $409 |
- 0.17%BAR
- 0.15%FGDL, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Gold funds
- Median 0.17%
FGDL 3rd cheapest of 10 funds
BAR 4th cheapest of 10 funds
BAR vs FGDL Dividends
- BAR None
- FGDL None
Distribution history
BAR vs FGDL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAR 19.4%, betterFGDL 19.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAR 1.02FGDL 1.02Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BAR −28.1%FGDL −28.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BAR 0.44FGDL 0.41
BAR and FGDL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
