Skip to content

BAR vs SGOL

GraniteShares Gold Trust

BARBNYSE Arca

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

SGOLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

BAR0.17%SGOL0.17%

Avg volume · 30D

SGOL 10.8×the volume

BAR221KSGOL2.39M

5Y return · a year

BAR +0.1pt

BAR+17.0%SGOL+16.9%

BAR vs SGOL Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+118.8%BAR+118.6%SGOL

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. BAR +118.8%. SGOL +118.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%150%200%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BAR 0.17%
SGOL 0.17%
Fund size
BAR $1.26B
SGOL $6.7B
1Y total return
BAR −1.6%
SGOL −1.5%, better
Holdings
BAR 1
SGOL 1
Avg volume (30D)
BAR 221K sh
SGOL 2.39M sh, better
NAV per share
BAR $38.50
SGOL $37.64
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAR: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 41. SGOL: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 63, Holdings not scored, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAR, SGOL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBARSGOL
Cost30% weightB59B59
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightD30B63Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC41B62Higher

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAR and SGOL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

SGOL ranks 3rd and BAR 6th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 82
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BSGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETFScore 69
  4. Rank 4BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BAAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 6BBARGraniteShares Gold TrustScore 62
  7. Rank 7BOUNZVanEck Merk Gold ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BARBGraniteShares Gold Trust

SGOLBabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

In short

BAR Real bars in a London vault, listed one by one on the sponsor's site every day. BAR landed in 2017 as the boutique fee-fighter among gold trusts: no lending, no derivatives, a 0.17% sponsor fee.

SGOL A 2009-vintage trust that owns actual gold bars and does exactly one job: track bullion's price after a 0.17% fee. Middle of the pack on cost, front of the pack on doing what the prospectus says.

Stated mandate

BAR The Trust seeks to have each Share’s value reflect the value of its gold assets after accrued expenses and liabilities, providing a simple way to invest similarly to gold.

SGOL The Trust seeks to track the price of physical gold bullion, after deducting its expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BAR Bullion only: the gold sits in ICBC Standard Bank's London vault, lending of the metal isn't permitted, and the trust can't hold derivatives.graniteshares.comsec.gov
  • You can check the claim: the bar list is published daily, and outside inspector Bureau Veritas visits the vault twice a year, one of those visits at random.graniteshares.comgraniteshares.com 2
  • Plain passive plumbing: mirror the LBMA Gold Price PM less expenses. It has hugged that gold benchmark very tightly.
  • SGOL Plain plumbing: a grantor trust holding physical bullion, with one job written into its own documents, to track the price of gold after deducting expenses.
  • Tracks the metal about as closely as the wrapper allows, one of the cleanest mandate implementations among physical gold funds.
  • Trading since 2009, through several full gold cycles, and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively.

Worth knowing

  • BAR No income here. Gold pays nothing, and the trust sells a sliver of its bullion to cover expenses, so the ounces behind each share drift down over time.graniteshares.com
  • Cheaper doors to the same metal exist: GLDM and IAUM both undercut BAR's fee, and BAR is only moderately traded next to the category's volume leaders.
  • Tax quirk of the wrapper: under current law, long-term gains on gold held through the trust are taxed as collectibles, at a maximum 28% rate.sec.gov
  • SGOL Cost sits at the category median: 0.17% a year, while IAUM (0.09%) and GLDM (0.10%) charge less to hold the same metal.
  • Bullion throws off no income. This is a price-of-gold holding, not a cash-flow one, and the fee comes out of trust assets.
  • One metal, no diversification. The shares go where gold goes, including the long flat stretches and sharp drawdowns.

Full BAR profile⁠

Full SGOL profile⁠

BAR vs SGOL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAR vs SGOL Cost

Same expense ratio

$3,546

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAR 0.17%

    $3,546

  • SGOL 0.17%

    $3,546

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAR 0.17%
  • SGOL 0.17%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530BAR $3,546SGOL $3,546

Year by year

YearBARSGOL
10$310$310
20$1,211$1,211
30$3,546$3,546

Expense ratio

  • 0.17%BAR
  • 0.17%SGOL
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

BAR 4th cheapest of 10 funds

SGOL 4th cheapest of 10 funds

BAR vs SGOL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BAR None
SGOL None

Distribution history

BARAll BAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SGOLAll SGOL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BAR vs SGOL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BAR
  • SGOL
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: SGOL −28.1% · Oct 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAR 19.4%SGOL 19.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAR 1.02SGOL 1.02Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAR −28.1%SGOL −28.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAR 0.44SGOL 0.40

BAR and SGOL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BARBvsGLDMA

    GraniteShares Gold Trust · SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGOLBvsGLDMA

    abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF · SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BARBvsIAUMA

    GraniteShares Gold Trust · iShares Gold Trust Micro

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGOLBvsIAUMA

    abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF · iShares Gold Trust Micro

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BARBvsFGDLB

    GraniteShares Gold Trust · Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGOLBvsFGDLB

    abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF · Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.