SGOL ranks 3rd and BAR 6th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.
BAR vs SGOL
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.17%0.17%
SGOL 10.8×the volume
221K2.39M
BAR +0.1pt
+17.0%+16.9%
BAR vs SGOL Performance
+118.8%+118.6%
- BAR 0.17%
- SGOL 0.17%
- BAR $1.26B
- SGOL $6.7B
- BAR −1.6%
- SGOL −1.5%, better
- BAR 1
- SGOL 1
- BAR 221K sh
- SGOL 2.39M sh, better
- BAR $38.50
- SGOL $37.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAR | SGOL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | B59 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C49 |
| Tradability | D30 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C41 | B62Higher |
Rank among Physical Gold funds
Same Category. BAR and SGOL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BARB
SGOLB
In short
BAR Real bars in a London vault, listed one by one on the sponsor's site every day. BAR landed in 2017 as the boutique fee-fighter among gold trusts: no lending, no derivatives, a 0.17% sponsor fee.
SGOL A 2009-vintage trust that owns actual gold bars and does exactly one job: track bullion's price after a 0.17% fee. Middle of the pack on cost, front of the pack on doing what the prospectus says.
Stated mandate
BAR The Trust seeks to have each Share’s value reflect the value of its gold assets after accrued expenses and liabilities, providing a simple way to invest similarly to gold.
SGOL The Trust seeks to track the price of physical gold bullion, after deducting its expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAR vs SGOL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAR vs SGOL Cost
Same expense ratio
$3,546
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAR 0.17%
$3,546
SGOL 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAR | SGOL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $1,211 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $3,546 |
- 0.17%BAR
- 0.17%SGOL
- Middle half of Physical Gold funds
- Median 0.17%
BAR 4th cheapest of 10 funds
SGOL 4th cheapest of 10 funds
BAR vs SGOL Dividends
- BAR None
- SGOL None
Distribution history
BAR vs SGOL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BAR
- SGOL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAR 19.4%SGOL 19.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- BAR 1.02SGOL 1.02Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- BAR −28.1%SGOL −28.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- BAR 0.44SGOL 0.40
BAR and SGOL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

