Skip to content

BAR vs GLDM

GraniteShares Gold Trust

BARBNYSE Arca

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

GLDMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

GLDM −0.07pt a year

BAR0.17%GLDM0.10%

Avg volume · 30D

GLDM 19.4×the volume

BAR221KGLDM4.28M

5Y return · a year

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

BAR+17.0%GLDM+17.0%

BAR vs GLDM Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+118.8%BAR+119.6%GLDM

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. BAR +118.8%. GLDM +119.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%50%150%200%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BAR 0.17%
GLDM 0.10%, better
Fund size
BAR $1.26B
GLDM $29.6B
1Y total return
BAR −1.6%
GLDM −1.5%, better
Holdings
BAR 1
GLDM 1
Avg volume (30D)
BAR 221K sh
GLDM 4.28M sh, better
NAV per share
BAR $38.50
GLDM $77.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAR: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 30, Holdings not scored, Durability 41. GLDM: Cost 91, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 73, Holdings not scored, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAR, GLDM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBARGLDM
Cost30% weightB59A91Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightD30A73Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC41B67Higher

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAR and GLDM are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

GLDM ranks 1st and BAR 6th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 82
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 5BAAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 6BBARGraniteShares Gold TrustScore 62
  5. Rank 7BOUNZVanEck Merk Gold ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BARBGraniteShares Gold Trust

GLDMASPDR Gold MiniShares Trust

In short

BAR Real bars in a London vault, listed one by one on the sponsor's site every day. BAR landed in 2017 as the boutique fee-fighter among gold trusts: no lending, no derivatives, a 0.17% sponsor fee.

GLDM The house that built the original gold ETF later built a cheaper one. GLDM holds physical gold bullion, charges 0.10% a year (a quarter of its older sibling's fee), and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.

Stated mandate

BAR The Trust seeks to have each Share’s value reflect the value of its gold assets after accrued expenses and liabilities, providing a simple way to invest similarly to gold.

GLDM GLDM seeks to reflect the performance of gold bullion, less the fund's expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BAR Bullion only: the gold sits in ICBC Standard Bank's London vault, lending of the metal isn't permitted, and the trust can't hold derivatives.graniteshares.comsec.gov
  • You can check the claim: the bar list is published daily, and outside inspector Bureau Veritas visits the vault twice a year, one of those visits at random.graniteshares.comgraniteshares.com 2
  • Plain passive plumbing: mirror the LBMA Gold Price PM less expenses. It has hugged that gold benchmark very tightly.
  • GLDM Ten basis points a year for bullion exposure, below the typical fee among physical gold funds and a quarter of the 0.40% on GLD, the sponsor's original gold trust.
  • Simple plumbing: a grantor trust that holds metal and seeks to reflect gold bullion less expenses. No futures roll, no swap counterparty, no miner-stock beta in the way.
  • One of the strongest implementations in its peer group, and among the more actively traded gold funds, which tends to keep the spread you pay getting in and out modest.
  • Launched in 2018 as the low-fee sibling to the 2004 original, it is now a large, established trust rather than a niche launch hoping to find an audience.

Worth knowing

  • BAR No income here. Gold pays nothing, and the trust sells a sliver of its bullion to cover expenses, so the ounces behind each share drift down over time.graniteshares.com
  • Cheaper doors to the same metal exist: GLDM and IAUM both undercut BAR's fee, and BAR is only moderately traded next to the category's volume leaders.
  • Tax quirk of the wrapper: under current law, long-term gains on gold held through the trust are taxed as collectibles, at a maximum 28% rate.sec.gov
  • GLDM Gold pays nothing. No dividends, no interest, and the trust covers its expenses out of the metal, so gold per share drifts down over time.
  • One metal, one price. This is undiversified exposure to bullion, and gold can swing hard in both directions.
  • A couple of rivals list lower headline fees (IAUM at 0.09%, FGDL at 0.00%) for similar physical gold exposure.

Full BAR profile⁠

Full GLDM profile⁠

BAR vs GLDM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAR vs GLDM Cost

Overpaying BAR vs GLDM

$1,440

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAR 0.17%

    $3,546

  • GLDM 0.10%

    $2,106

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAR 0.17%
  • GLDM 0.10%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530BAR $3,546GLDM $2,106

Year by year

YearBARGLDMOverpaying
10$310$183$127
20$1,211$717$494
30$3,546$2,106$1,440

Expense ratio

  • 0.17%BAR
  • 0.10%GLDM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

GLDM 2nd cheapest of 10 funds

BAR 4th cheapest of 10 funds

BAR vs GLDM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BAR None
GLDM None

Distribution history

BARAll BAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GLDMAll GLDM payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BAR vs GLDM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BAR
  • GLDM
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: BAR −28.1% · Oct 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAR 19.4%GLDM 19.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAR 1.02GLDM 1.03, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAR −28.1%GLDM −28.0%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAR 0.44GLDM 0.41

BAR and GLDM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BARBvsIAUMA

    GraniteShares Gold Trust · iShares Gold Trust Micro

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLDMAvsIAUMA

    SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust · iShares Gold Trust Micro

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BARBvsSGOLB

    GraniteShares Gold Trust · abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLDMAvsSGOLB

    SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust · abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BARBvsFGDLB

    GraniteShares Gold Trust · Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GLDMAvsFGDLB

    SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust · Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.10% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.