IAUM ranks 2nd and BAR 6th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.
BAR vs IAUM
100%by weight
IAUM −0.08pt a year
0.17%0.09%
IAUM 12.2×the volume
221K2.7M
IAUM +0.1pt
+16.7%+16.8%
BAR vs IAUM Performance
+116.1%+117.2%
- BAR 0.17%
- IAUM 0.09%, better
- BAR $1.29B
- IAUM $7.87B
- BAR −3.1%
- IAUM −3.0%, better
- BAR 1
- IAUM 1
- BAR 221K sh
- IAUM 2.7M sh, better
- BAR $39.62
- IAUM $38.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAR | IAUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C49 |
| Tradability | D34 | C46Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C41 | B60Higher |
Rank among Physical Gold funds
Same Category. BAR and IAUM are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BARB
IAUMA
In short
BAR Real bars in a London vault, listed one by one on the sponsor's site every day. BAR landed in 2017 as the boutique fee-fighter among gold trusts: no lending, no derivatives, a 0.17% sponsor fee.
IAUM Bullion in a vault, at 0.09% a year, roughly half the typical fee among physical gold funds. This is iShares' small-fee take on owning metal, priced off the LBMA Gold Price benchmark.
Stated mandate
BAR The Trust seeks to have each Share’s value reflect the value of its gold assets after accrued expenses and liabilities, providing a simple way to invest similarly to gold.
IAUM The Trust seeks to reflect the performance of gold, before its expenses and liabilities, by holding physical gold.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAR vs IAUM Holdings
How BAR and IAUM differ
100%
Shared holdings make up 100% of BAR and 100% of IAUM.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for BAR and IAUM.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for BAR and IAUM.
Concentration
- BAR100.0%
- IAUM100.0%
- BAR1
- IAUM1
Asset class
- BAR
- Commodities
- IAUM
- Commodities
Holdings
- Only in BAR0
- In both1
- Only in IAUM0
Only in BAR
0 securities, 0.0% of BAR by weight
Only in IAUM
0 securities, 0.0% of IAUM by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BARMore in IAUM | BAR | IAUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Gold | Same weight | 100.00% | 100.00% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAR vs IAUM Cost
Overpaying BAR vs IAUM
$1,648
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAR 0.17%
$3,546
IAUM 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAR | IAUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $165 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $646 | $565 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $1,898 | $1,648 |
- 0.17%BAR
- 0.09%IAUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Physical Gold funds
- Median 0.17%
IAUM cheapest of 10 funds
BAR 4th cheapest of 10 funds
BAR vs IAUM Dividends
- BAR None
- IAUM None
Distribution history
BAR vs IAUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BAR
- IAUM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAR 19.4%IAUM 19.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- BAR 1.02IAUM 1.03, better
- Worst fall
- BAR −28.1%IAUM −28.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- BAR 0.44IAUM 0.41
BAR and IAUM in the news


Deep Dive
The SPDR That Eats Itself




Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.