BBCA ranks 4th and EWA 8th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs EWA
BBCA −0.31pt a year
0.19%0.50%
EWA 7.3×the volume
330K2.41M
BBCA +4.9pt
+11.5%+6.6%
BBCA vs EWA Performance
+72.5%+37.4%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- EWA 0.50%
- BBCA $11.9B
- EWA $1.25B
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- EWA +13.8%
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWA 2.87%, better
- BBCA 78
- EWA 47
- BBCA 330K sh
- EWA 2.41M sh, better
- BBCA $104.51
- EWA $29.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | EWA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B55 |
| Mission | B59 | A82Higher |
| Risk | A87Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | B55 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C46 |
| Durability | B58 | A76Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and EWA are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
EWAB
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
EWA Trading since 1996, EWA is the veteran way to own Australia from a US brokerage account: roughly 50 of the market's biggest listed names, tracking the MSCI Australia Index, in one ticker.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
EWA The fund seeks to track an index of Australian equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Australia.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs EWA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs EWA Cost
Overpaying EWA vs BBCA
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
EWA 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | EWA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $900 | $553 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,460 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $9,979 | $6,027 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.50%EWA
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EWA 14th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs EWA Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWA 2.87%, better
- BBCA $1.75
- EWA $0.85
- BBCA $0.42
- EWA $0.40
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- EWA Jun 15, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- EWA Jun 18, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- EWA Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs EWA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- EWA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterEWA 16.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterEWA 0.75
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterEWA −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88EWA 0.99
BBCA and EWA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




