FLGB ranks 3rd and EWA 8th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
EWA vs FLGB
FLGB −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
EWA 22.7×the volume
2.41M106K
FLGB +5.1pt
+6.6%+11.7%
EWA vs FLGB Performance
+37.4%+74.3%
- EWA 0.50%
- FLGB 0.09%, better
- EWA $1.25B
- FLGB $878M
- EWA +13.8%
- FLGB +15.9%, better
- EWA 2.87%
- FLGB 2.87%
- EWA 47
- FLGB 89
- EWA 2.41M sh, better
- FLGB 106K sh
- EWA $29.46
- FLGB $36.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EWA | FLGB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A82Higher | A73 |
| Risk | C49 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C46 | A72Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | C53 |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. EWA and FLGB are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EWAB
FLGBA
In short
EWA Trading since 1996, EWA is the veteran way to own Australia from a US brokerage account: roughly 50 of the market's biggest listed names, tracking the MSCI Australia Index, in one ticker.
FLGB Britain in one ticker for nine basis points. Franklin's UK tracker follows a capped FTSE index of roughly 110 British companies and charges a small fraction of what the typical index fund in its peer group costs.
Stated mandate
EWA The fund seeks to track an index of Australian equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in Australia.
FLGB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE UK RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EWA vs FLGB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EWA vs FLGB Cost
Overpaying EWA vs FLGB
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EWA 0.50%
$9,979
FLGB 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EWA | FLGB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%EWA
- 0.09%FLGB, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
FLGB cheapest of 38 funds
EWA 14th cheapest of 38 funds
EWA vs FLGB Dividends
- EWA 2.87%
- FLGB 2.87%
- EWA $0.85
- FLGB $1.06
- EWA $0.40
- FLGB $0.47
- EWA Jun 15, 2026
- FLGB Jun 26, 2026
- EWA Jun 18, 2026
- FLGB Jul 6, 2026
- EWA Twice a year
- FLGB Twice a year
Distribution history
EWA vs FLGB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EWA
- FLGB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EWA 16.3%FLGB 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EWA 0.75FLGB 1.44, better
- Worst fall
- EWA −24.8%, betterFLGB −25.9%
- Market sensitivity
- EWA 0.99FLGB 0.75
EWA and FLGB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




